Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Description of a novel robotic early post-prostatectomy anastomotic repair technique and institutional outcomes
David Strauss1, Eric Cho1, Matthew Loecher1
1Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Objective:
A vesicourethral anastomotic leak (VUAL) is a known complication following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. The natural history of a VUAL has been well described and is frequently managed with prolonged catheterization. With increasing emphasis on patient reported outcomes, catheter duration and VUAL are associated with significant short-term quality of life impairment. We aimed to present a case series of our robotic early post-prostatectomy anastomotic repair technique, defined as revision within 6 weeks from index surgery.
Methods:
A single institution prospective database identified eleven patients with a VUAL from July 2016 to October 2022 who underwent robotic early post-prostatectomy anastomotic repair by a single surgeon. Patients were diagnosed with a VUAL on pre-operative CT urogram or CT/fluoroscopic cystogram. The primary outcome was resolution of the anastomotic leak, defined as no contrast extravasation on post-operative cystography. Secondary outcomes included post-repair catheter duration and continence on the last follow-up defined as pad(s) per day.
Results:
The mean time to intervention after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy was 21 days. Eight of the eleven (72.7%) patients had no evidence of extravasation on post-repair cystogram. The range from intervention to first cystogram was 7-20 days. The median catheter duration for those with successful intervention was 10 days. The median catheter duration for those with the leak on initial post-operative cystogram was 20 days. At a mean follow-up time of 25 months, eight (72.7%) patients reported using no pads per day, and three (27.3%) patients reported one pad per day.
Conclusion:
Management of a VUAL has traditionally relied on prolonged catheter drainage and the tincture of time. As the role of robotic reconstruction has been shown to be a viable modality for management of bladder neck contracture, it is important to reconsider prior dogmas of urologic care. Our case series suggests that an early repair is safe and has a high success rate. Early robotic intervention gives providers an additional tool in aiding patient recovery.
