Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Influence of Model Evolution and System Roles on ChatGPT's Performance in Chinese Medical Licensing Exams:
Shuai Ming1,2,3, Qingge Guo1,2,3, Wenjun Cheng4
1Department of Ophthalmology, Henan Eye Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Background:
With the increasing application of large language models like ChatGPT in various industries, its potential in the medical domain, especially in standardized examinations, has become a focal point of research.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of ChatGPT, focusing on its accuracy and reliability in the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination (CNMLE).
Methods:
The CNMLE 2022 question set, consisting of 500 single-answer multiple choices questions, were reclassified into 15 medical subspecialties. Each question was tested 8 to 12 times in Chinese on the OpenAI platform from April 24 to May 15, 2023. Three key factors were considered: the version of GPT-3.5 and 4.0, the prompt's designation of system roles tailored to medical subspecialties, and repetition for coherence. A passing accuracy threshold was established as 60%. The χ2 tests and κ values were employed to evaluate the model's accuracy and consistency.
Results:
GPT-4.0 achieved a passing accuracy of 72.7%, which was significantly higher than that of GPT-3.5 (54%; P<.001). The variability rate of repeated responses from GPT-4.0 was lower than that of GPT-3.5 (9% vs 19.5%; P<.001). However, both models showed relatively good response coherence, with κ values of 0.778 and 0.610, respectively. System roles numerically increased accuracy for both GPT-4.0 (0.3%-3.7%) and GPT-3.5 (1.3%-4.5%), and reduced variability by 1.7% and 1.8%, respectively (P>.05). In subgroup analysis, ChatGPT achieved comparable accuracy among different question types (P>.05). GPT-4.0 surpassed the accuracy threshold in 14 of 15 subspecialties, while GPT-3.5 did so in 7 of 15 on the first response.
Conclusions:
GPT-4.0 passed the CNMLE and outperformed GPT-3.5 in key areas such as accuracy, consistency, and medical subspecialty expertise. Adding a system role insignificantly enhanced the model's reliability and answer coherence. GPT-4.0 showed promising potential in medical education and clinical practice, meriting further study.
