Predicting and improving outcome in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury

Mathilde Chevignard1,2,3, Hugo Câmara-Costa1,2,3, Georges Dellatolas3

  • 1Rehabilitation Department for Children with Acquired Neurological Injury, Saint Maurice Hospitals, Saint Maurice, France.

PubMed

Insights

Severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (spTBI), a significant public health issue, leads to lasting physical and cognitive deficits. Research highlights disparities in care and outcomes, emphasizing family-focused interventions for long-term recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Neurotrauma
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (spTBI), including abusive head trauma (AHT), presents substantial long-term physical, neurological, cognitive, behavioral, and social challenges.
  • spTBI is a critical public health concern with significant lifelong consequences for affected children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive narrative review of spTBI, covering causes, epidemiology, critical care, outcomes, and interventions.
  • To synthesize current research from 2019-2024, including seminal prior work, on spTBI management and long-term effects.

Main Methods:

  • Narrative review of published studies and reviews on spTBI from January 2019 to February 2024.
  • Inclusion of significant pre-2019 papers to provide historical context and foundational knowledge.

Main Results:

  • Significant disparities exist in spTBI causes, treatments, and outcomes based on country and socioeconomic factors.
  • Abusive head trauma (AHT) is associated with poor outcomes, and adherence to critical care guidelines requires improvement.
  • Neuroimaging and biomarkers are evolving predictors of outcomes, with long-term cognitive and psychosocial difficulties being the most prevalent and disabling.

Conclusions:

  • Distinguishing between objective and subjective measures is crucial for assessing long-term difficulties post-spTBI.
  • Family/caregiver-centered interventions, ecological approaches, and technology-assisted delivery are recommended to mitigate long-term challenges.
  • Further investigation into the evidence base for critical care guidelines is warranted.
Abstract