The nature and validity of implicit bias training for health care providers and trainees: A systematic review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Nao Hagiwara1, Conor Duffy2, John Cyrus3
1Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Abstract:
The number of health care educational institutions/organizations adopting implicit bias training is growing. Our systematic review of 77 studies (published 1 January 2003 through 21 September 2022) investigated how implicit bias training in health care is designed/delivered and whether gaps in knowledge translation compromised the reliability and validity of the training. The primary training target was race/ethnicity (49.3%); trainings commonly lack specificity on addressing implicit prejudice or stereotyping (67.5%). They involved a combination of hands-on and didactic approaches, lasting an average of 343.15 min, often delivered in a single day (53.2%). Trainings also exhibit translational gaps, diverging from current literature (10 to 67.5%), and lack internal (99.9%), face (93.5%), and external (100%) validity. Implicit bias trainings in health care are characterized by bias in methodological quality and translational gaps, potentially compromising their impacts.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Halo Effect

