Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025
High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
The relationship between clinical impairment and blood drug concentration: Comparison between the most prevalent
Knut Hjelmeland1, Gerrit Middelkoop1, Jørg Mørland2
1Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, Oslo 0424, Norway.
Aim:
The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations of four different drug classes; ethanol, benzodiazepines, amphetamines and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and driver impairment as assessed by a clinical test of impairment (CTI).
Methods:
Data was retrieved from a national database on CTI assessments and accompanying blood drug concentrations from apprehended drivers. All drug concentrations in blood were quantified using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and compared to the results of the CTI which were categorized as either "not impaired", "mildly impaired", "moderately impaired", or "considerably impaired".
Results:
A total number of 15 514 individual mono drug-cases collected over 9 years was included. 89 % were men and the median age was 34 years. In addition, 3 684 individual cases with similar age and gender distribution where no drugs were detected, were included as a reference group. For ethanol and benzodiazepines the percentage of clinically impaired cases increased markedly from lower to higher concentration windows, from 60 % to 97 % for ethanol and from 38 % to 76 % for benzodiazepines. The corresponding increase for amphetamines and THC was modest, from 43 % to 58 % for amphetamines and from 41 % to 55 % for THC. The correlation between drug concentration and degree of impairment was high for ethanol (Spearman´s rho=0.548, p<0.001) and relatively high for benzodiazepines (Spearman´s rho=0.377, p<0.001), but low for amphetamines (Spearman´s rho=0.078, p<0.001) and THC (Spearman´s rho=0.100, p<0.001).
Conclusion:
The percentage of impaired drivers increased with increasing blood drug concentration for all four drug classes, most pronounced for ethanol and benzodiazepines and much less for amphetamines and THC. The median blood drug concentration increased with increasing magnitude of impairment for ethanol and benzodiazepines, while this was much less pronounced for amphetamines and THC. The ranges of drug concentrations, however, were wide for all four drug classes in all impairment categories as assessed by individual clinical examination.
More Related Videos
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
08:54Validated LC-MS/MS Panel for Quantifying 11 Drug-Resistant TB Medications in Small Hair Samples
Published on: May 19, 2020
Related Concept Videos
01:23Drug Concentrations: Measurements
Plasma...
01:14Time Course of Drug Effect
01:15Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...
01:21Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
01:23Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Physiological Barriers
The capillary endothelial barrier allows only smaller molecules below 600 Da (Daltons) to pass through. It also restricts drugs like heparin that are bound to blood components, limiting their movement within the bloodstream.
The...
01:09Hepatic Drug Clearance: Effect of Protein Binding
For low-extraction-ratio drugs that are less than 80% protein-bound, minor changes in protein binding...