Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

530
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
530
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.7K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

3.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
3.1K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

4.2K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Emphasizing the importance of prudent antibiotic use decreases unrealistic perceptions of new antibiotic discoveries.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2025
Same author

Seeing an apocalyptic post-antibiotic future lowers antibiotics expectations and requests.

Communications medicine·2024
Same author

Vaccination invitations sent by warm and competent medical professionals disclosing risks and benefits increase trust and booking intention and reduce inequalities between ethnic groups.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2024
Same author

The social learning account of trypophobia.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024
Same author

When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning.

Cognition·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.0K

Do claims about certainty make estimates less certain?

Karl Halvor Teigen1, Marie Juanchich2

  • 1University of Oslo, Norway.

Cognition
|August 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Claiming statements are "certain" can paradoxically reduce their perceived credibility and precision. Unqualified statements are often seen as more trustworthy and less ambiguous, impacting communication strategies for conveying confidence.

Keywords:
CertaintyCredibilityFramingPrecisenessVerbal probabilities

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.2K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.0K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.2K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Verbal probability expressions often place "certainty" at the highest level, implying probabilities near 1.
  • Few studies have compared explicit certainty claims with plain, unqualified statements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how explicit claims of certainty affect perceptions of credibility, precision, and evidential support.
  • To compare explicit certainty statements with plain, unmarked declarative statements.

Main Methods:

  • Nine studies involving 2784 participants were conducted.
  • Participants evaluated statements with and without explicit certainty markers on scales of credibility, precision, and evidential basis.

Main Results:

  • Statements claiming certainty were often perceived as less trustworthy, reliable, and held with lower confidence than unmarked statements.
  • Certainty statements were found to be more ambiguous, potentially indicating undefined upper bounds and affecting interpretations in risky choice scenarios.
  • Impersonal certainty ("it is certain") was perceived as more accurate than personal certainty ("I am certain"), particularly for future predictions.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit claims of certainty can undermine credibility and precision, contrary to common assumptions.
  • Omitting certainty claims may enhance the perceived consensus of estimates.
  • Effective communication of certainty might be achieved by avoiding explicit mentions of certainty.