Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decomposing neuroanatomical heterogeneity in depression: insights from an ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group study in 5146 individuals.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Brain-wide Functional Connectivity Alterations in Major Depressive Disorder and Baseline Correlates of Treatment Response.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2026
Same author

The impact of a loss of control over threat on stress reactivity.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Altered prefrontal effective connectivity during emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same author

Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis connectivity during food cue and taste processing under stress.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI
12:51

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Published on: October 6, 2011

12.9K

Using electrodermal activity to estimate fear learning differences in anxiety: A multiverse analysis.

Matthew D Greaves1, Kim L Felmingham2, Luke J Ney3

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Behaviour Research and Therapy
|August 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Differences in fear responses between anxious and non-anxious individuals using electrodermal activity (EDA) are not robust. A multiverse analysis revealed that EDA-estimated fear learning differences are vulnerable to researcher choices.

Keywords:
AnxietyElectrodermal activityFear learningMultiverse

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.2K
Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality
10:38

Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality

Published on: August 9, 2010

20.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI
12:51

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Published on: October 6, 2011

12.9K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.2K
Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality
10:38

Human Fear Conditioning Conducted in Full Immersion 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality

Published on: August 9, 2010

20.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychophysiology
  • Clinical Science

Background:

  • Meta-analyses suggest differences in Pavlovian fear responses between anxious and non-anxious individuals, often measured by electrodermal activity (EDA).
  • Recent studies question the robustness of these findings due to variations in analytical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the robustness of electrodermal activity (EDA) findings in fear conditioning research.
  • To assess the impact of analytical choices on the observed differences in fear responses between anxious and non-anxious individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Employed the multiverse approach, conducting 1240 analyses to explore various analytical choices in clinical fear conditioning research.
  • Examined different permutations of typical analytic choices to assess their impact on electrodermal activity (EDA) data.

Main Results:

  • Only 1.45% of the conducted analyses yielded theoretically congruent, statistically significant effects.
  • The strength and direction of estimated fear learning effects varied considerably depending on the electrodermal activity (EDA) processing methods used.

Conclusions:

  • Electrodermal activity (EDA)-estimated fear learning differences are highly susceptible to researcher degrees of freedom.
  • Specific analytical choices in fear conditioning research warrant careful consideration and should be approached with caution to ensure result validity.