Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Is Kindergarten Ability Group Placement Biased? New Data, New Methods, New Answers
Paul T von Hippel1, Ana P Cañedo2
1LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin.
Abstract:
Half of kindergarten teachers split children into higher and lower ability groups for reading or math. In national data, we predicted kindergarten ability group placement using linear and ordinal logistic regression with classroom fixed effects. In fall, test scores were the best predictors of group placement, but there was bias favoring girls, high-SES (socioeconomic status) children, and Asian Americans, who received higher placements than their scores alone would predict. Net of SES, there was no bias against placing black children in higher groups. By spring, one third of kindergartners moved groups, and high-SES children moved up more than their score gains alone would predict. Teacher-reported behaviors (e.g., attentiveness, approaches to learning) helped explain girls' higher placements, but did little to explain the higher placements of Asian American and high-SES children.
More Related Videos
08:13Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
Published on: May 10, 2019
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Behrens–Fisher Test
This test...