Towards reliable healthcare Imaging: conditional contrastive generative adversarial network for handling class...

Medical imaging datasets frequently encounter a data imbalance issue, where the majority of pixels correspond to healthy regions, and the minority belong to affected regions. This uneven distribution of pixels exacerbates the challenges associated with computer-aided diagnosis. The networks trained with imbalanced data tends to exhibit bias toward majority classes, often demonstrate high precision but low sensitivity.

We have designed a new network based on adversarial learning namely conditional contrastive generative adversarial network (CCGAN) to tackle the problem of class imbalancing in a highly imbalancing MRI dataset. The proposed model has three new components: (1) class-specific attention, (2) region rebalancing module (RRM) and supervised contrastive-based learning network (SCoLN). The class-specific attention focuses on more discriminative areas of the input representation, capturing more relevant features. The RRM promotes a more balanced distribution of features across various regions of the input representation, ensuring a more equitable segmentation process. The generator of the CCGAN learns pixel-level segmentation by receiving feedback from the SCoLN based on the true negative and true positive maps. This process ensures that final semantic segmentation not only addresses imbalanced data issues but also enhances classification accuracy.

The proposed model has shown state-of-art-performance on five highly imbalance medical image segmentation datasets. Therefore, the suggested model holds significant potential for application in medical diagnosis, in cases characterized by highly imbalanced data distributions. The CCGAN achieved the highest scores in terms of dice similarity coefficient (DSC) on various datasets: 0.965 ± 0.012 for BUS2017, 0.896 ± 0.091 for DDTI, 0.786 ± 0.046 for LiTS MICCAI 2017, 0.712 ± 1.5 for the ATLAS dataset, and 0.877 ± 1.2 for the BRATS 2015 dataset. DeepLab-V3 follows closely, securing the second-best position with DSC scores of 0.948 ± 0.010 for BUS2017, 0.895 ± 0.014 for DDTI, 0.763 ± 0.044 for LiTS MICCAI 2017, 0.696 ± 1.1 for the ATLAS dataset, and 0.846 ± 1.4 for the BRATS 2015 dataset.