Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026
Induction and Assessment of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Langendorff-perfused Rat Hearts
Published on: July 27, 2015
Perfusion Abnormalities on 24-Hour Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Complete Endovascular Reperfusion
Adnan Mujanovic1,2, Anick Imhof1, Shaokai Zheng1,3
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.M., A.I., S.Z., E.I.P., B.L.S., T.D., A.H., R.W., J.G., J.K.), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Background:
Perfusion abnormalities in the infarct and salvaged penumbra have been proposed as a potential reason for poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2) despite complete angiographic reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [TICI3]). In this study, we aimed to identify different microvascular perfusion patterns and their association with clinical outcomes among TICI3 patients.
Methods:
University Hospital Bern's stroke registry of all patients between February 2015 and December 2021. Macrovascular reperfusion was graded using the TICI scale. Microvascular reperfusion status was evaluated within the infarct area on cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow perfusion maps obtained 24-hour postintervention. Primary outcome was functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) evaluated with the logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and 24-hour infarct volume from follow-up imaging.
Results:
Based on microvascular perfusion findings, the entire cohort (N=248) was stratified into one of the 4 clusters: (1) normoperfusion (no perfusion abnormalities; n=143/248); (2) hyperperfusion (hyperperfusion on both cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow; n=54/248); (3) hypoperfusion (hypoperfusion on both cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow; n=14/248); and (4) mixed (discrepant findings, eg, cerebral blood volume hypoperfusion and cerebral blood flow hyperperfusion; n=37/248). Compared with the normoperfusion cluster, patients in the hypoperfusion cluster were less likely to achieve functional independence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9]), while patients in the hyperperfusion cluster tended to have better outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.3-8.8]).
Conclusions:
In around half of TICI3 patients, perfusion abnormalities on the microvascular level can be observed. Microvascular hypoperfusion, despite complete macrovascular reperfusion, is rare but may explain the poor clinical course among some TICI3 patients, while a detrimental effect of hyperperfusion after reperfusion could not be confirmed.
