Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

612
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
612
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

371
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
371
Visual System01:26

Visual System

561
Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
561

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting the classic effect of reward on attentional priority maps: behavioral evidence for an attentional gating of spatially-specific reward signals.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Ignoring distractors takes its (memory) toll.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Perceptual Organization Facilitates Object-Based Distractor Filtering.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996).

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Goal-directed behavior in Tenebrio molitor larvae.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

The dynamics of statistical learning in visual search and its interaction with salience processing: An EEG study.

NeuroImage·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

308

Learning to ignore visual onset distractors hinges on a configuration-dependent coordinates system.

Massimo Turatto1, Matteo De Tommaso2, Leonardo Chelazzi3

  • 1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|August 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Attentional capture by visual distractors habituates over time. This habituation occurs based on configuration-specific representations, not retinotopic or spatiotopic ones, indicating context-dependent rejection of distractors.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.0K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

308
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.0K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Attentional capture by visual onset distractors decreases with repeated exposure (habituation).
  • The spatial reference frame underlying this habituation is not well understood.
  • Previous research has extensively characterized habituation but not its neural representation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the spatial frame of reference for habituation of attentional capture.
  • To determine whether habituation relies on retinotopic, spatiotopic, or configuration-specific visual representations.
  • To elucidate the neural mechanisms of distractor rejection.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual orientation discrimination task while ignoring salient onset distractors.
  • Habituation was induced by repeatedly presenting the target and distractor in fixed locations.
  • After habituation, the spatial arrangement of target and distractor was altered to test different spatial representations.

Main Results:

  • Habituation of attentional capture showed minimal reliance on spatiotopic representations.
  • Results ruled out retinotopic representations, supporting configuration-specific representations.
  • Subsequent experiments confirmed that habituation is based on configuration-specific, context-dependent encoding.

Conclusions:

  • Habituation of attentional capture to visual onset distractors is mediated by configuration-specific representations.
  • Distractor rejection occurs at higher visual processing levels sensitive to context.
  • This suggests a mechanism for filtering irrelevant information based on learned spatial configurations.