Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

2.3K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
2.3K
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

134
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
134
Aggression01:47

Aggression

27.8K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
27.8K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

92
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
92
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

12.9K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
12.9K
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

346
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
346

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research on microaggressions and their impact assesses neither microaggressions nor their impact.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same author

AI assists adversarial collaboration in debate on minority salience.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Rebuilding trust in CBT: Intellectual humility and multicultural competencies as responses to political criticism.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same author

On the relationship between indirect measures of Black versus White racial attitudes and discriminatory outcomes: An adversarial collaboration using a sample of White Americans.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Reflections on adversarial collaboration from the adversaries: was it worth it<b>?</b>

Theory and society·2026
Same author

Morally offensive scientific findings activate cognitive chicanery.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

115

Adversarial collaboration: An undervalued approach in behavioral science.

Stephen J Ceci1, Cory J Clark2, Lee Jussim3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Cornell University.

The American Psychologist
|August 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adversarial collaborations (ACs) enhance scientific reliability and validity by bringing together diverse perspectives. This underutilized approach improves research integrity and the reputation of scientific disciplines.

More Related Videos

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.3K
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

115
Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.3K
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Scientific Methodology
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Open Science initiatives like preregistration improve research reliability.
  • However, initiatives enhancing scientific validity, such as adversarial collaborations (ACs), are underutilized.
  • ACs involve diverse and contradictory perspectives to strengthen scientific rigor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and advocate for Adversarial Collaborations (ACs) as a crucial tool for enhancing scientific validity.
  • To explain the mechanisms by which ACs improve both reliability and validity in scientific research.
  • To highlight the broad applicability of ACs beyond team science.

Main Methods:

  • The study provides background information on Adversarial Collaborations (ACs).
  • It argues for the effectiveness, essential nature, and underutilization of ACs.
  • The authors explain how ACs enhance scientific reliability and validity.

Main Results:

  • Adversarial collaborations (ACs) are effective, essential, and underutilized.
  • ACs enhance both the reliability and validity of scientific findings.
  • The benefits of ACs extend to fact-checking, wisdom of crowds, and peer review.

Conclusions:

  • Adversarial collaborations are critical for improving the validity of scientific research.
  • Wider adoption of ACs can increase the efficacy of science-based policies and interventions.
  • ACs can help restore public trust in science by demonstrating open-minded consideration of diverse viewpoints.