Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
Published on: October 21, 2016
Tracing sulfate sources in a tropical agricultural catchment with a stable isotope Bayesian mixing model
David Saka1, Eric Ofosu Antwi2, Grzegorz Skrzypek3
1Regional Centre for Energy and Environmental Sustainability, University of Energy and Natural Resources, P. O. Box SYI 214, Sunyani, Ghana; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Energy and Natural Resources, P. O. Box SYI 214, Sunyani, Ghana; Water Resources Research Centre, National Nuclear Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, P. O. Box LG 80, Accra, Ghana.
Abstract:
Sulfate (SO42-) is an essential anion in drinking water and a vital macronutrient for plant growth. However, elevated sulfate levels can impact ecosystem or human health and could be an important indicator of acid rock drainage or pollution. Therefore, monitoring SO42- sources and transport is important for water quality assessments. This study focused on exploring the sources and transformations of SO42- as well as estimating the proportional contribution of the potential SO42- pollutant sources to groundwater and surface water in a tropical river basin, the Densu River Basin. The study used major ions combined with stable sulfur and oxygen isotope compositions and a Bayesian isotope mixing model, MixSIAR. The major ion characteristics indicate that SO42- concentrations remain stable throughout the rainy and dry seasons but originate from diverse sources. The multi-isotope model (δ34SSO4, δ18OSO4) identified four potential SO42- sources: detergent, precipitation, sewage, and sulfate fertilizer. However, the δ34SSO4 and δ18OSO4 values of the fertilizer source signatures overlapped with those of precipitation and sewage. Nevertheless, the contributions from each source were disentangled using the MixSIAR model, which revealed sewage as the most dominant SO42- pollutant in the Densu Basin, accounting for ~47 % of sulfate in groundwater and ~ 56 % of sulfate in surface water. Sulfate fertilizer (~33 %) was the second most important source after sewage for groundwater, while detergent (~23 %) was the second most important source for surface water. The redox processes of bacterial sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation were determined to have a minimal impact on the sulfur isotope fractionation within the basin. This study highlights the benefits of combining major ions, sulfur isotopes and the MixSIAR model for identifying sources of sulfate. This approach accounts for uncertainties in source contributions which allows for more robust and reliable apportionment of sulfate sources. The study emphasizes the need for effective waste management and pollution control measures to protect water quality and provides vital guidelines on how to partition sulfate sources on a large catchment scale and evidence for making pollution management decisions on water resources.
More Related Videos
09:31Preparation of Authigenic Pyrite from Methane-bearing Sediments for In Situ Sulfur Isotope Analysis Using SIMS
Published on: August 31, 2017
12:47Workflow Based on the Combination of Isotopic Tracer Experiments to Investigate Microbial Metabolism of Multiple Nutrient Sources
Published on: January 22, 2018