Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Quinoline-based Schiff bases as possible antidiabetic agents: ligand-based pharmacophore modeling, 3D QSAR, docking,
Shriram D Ranade1, Shankar G Alegaon1, Nayeem A Khatib2
1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, KLE College of Pharmacy, Belagavi, KLE Academy of Higher education and Research Belagavi - 590010 Karnataka India sgalegaon@gmail.com sgalegaon@klepharm.edu.
None:
α-Glucosidase enzyme inhibition is a legitimate approach to combat type 2 diabetes mellitus as it manages to control postprandial hyperglycemia. In this pursuit, a literature search identified quinoline-based molecules as potential α-glucosidase inhibitors. Thus our intended approach is to identify pharmacophoric features responsible for the α-glucosidase inhibition. This was achieved by performing, ligand-based pharmacophore modeling, 3D QSAR model development, pharmacophore-based screening of a rationally designed quinoline-based benzohydrazide Schiff base library, identifying, synthesizing and characterizing molecules (6a-6j) by IR, (1H and 13C) NMR, and mass studies. Further, these molecules were evaluated for α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory potential. Compound 6c was found to inhibit α-glucosidase enzyme with an IC50 value of 12.95 ± 2.35 μM. Similarly, compound 6b was found to have an IC50 value of 19.37 ± 0.96 μM as compared to acarbose (IC50: 32.63 ± 1.07 μM); the inhibitory kinetics of compounds 6b and 6c revealed a competitive type of inhibition; the inhibitory effect can be attributed to its mapped pharmacophoric feature and model validation with a survival score of 5.0697 and vector score of 0.9552. The QSAR model showed a strong correlation with an R 2 value of 0.96. All the compounds (6a-6j) showed no toxicity in L929 cell lines by the MTT assay method. Further, the binding orientation and stability of the molecules were assessed using molecular docking studies and MD trajectory analysis. The energy profile of the molecules with protein as a complex and molecules alone was evaluated using MM/GBSA and DFT calculations, respectively; finally, the pharmacokinetic profile was computed using ADMET analysis.
More Related Videos
10:25Screening Traditional Chinese Medicine Compounds for Inhibiting UCHL3 Activity Based on Molecular Docking and Deubiquitinating Enzyme Probe Technology
Published on: November 22, 2024
08:15Author Spotlight: Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking to Decipher the Action of Jiawei Shengjiang San Against Diabetic Kidney Disease
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Drug Discovery: Overview
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength