Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025
Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
Published on: April 14, 2014
Radiologic Predictors of Visual Outcome in Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-Related Optic Neuritis
Armin Handzic1, Jim Shenchu Xie2, Nanthaya Tisavipat3
1Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Purpose:
This study aimed to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers are associated with visual prognosis in myelin oligodendrocyte protein (MOG)-associated optic neuritis (ON).
Design:
Cross-sectional analysis.
Participants:
Patients meeting 2023 international diagnostic criteria for MOG antibody-associated disease who were seen for first episodes of MOG-associated ON at 3 tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practices between January 2017 and July 2023 were enrolled. Patients who received < 3 months of neuro-ophthalmic follow-up and did not demonstrate visual recovery (visual acuity [VA] ≥ 20/20 and visual field mean deviation [VFMD] > -5.0 dB) during this time were excluded.
Methods:
Patients underwent contrast-enhanced, fat-suppressed MRI of the brain and orbits within 1 month of symptom onset.
Main Outcome Measures:
The associations between radiologic biomarkers and poor VA outcome (< 20/40), incomplete VA recovery (< 20/20), and poor VFMD outcome (VFMD < -5.0 dB) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for time from symptom onset to treatment and nadir VA or VFMD. Radiologic biomarkers included length of optic nerve enhancement (> 25% vs. < 25%; > 50% vs. < 50%; and > 75% vs. < 75%); degree of orbital, canalicular, and intracranial or chiasmal optic nerve enhancement (mild vs. moderate to severe compared with the lacrimal gland); and absence versus presence of optic nerve sheath enhancement on baseline T1-weighted MRI.
Results:
A total of 129 eyes of 92 patients (median age, 37.0 years [interquartile range, 20.8-51.3 years]; 65.2% female) were included. Poor VA outcome was seen in 6.2% of patients, incomplete VA recovery was seen in 19.4% of patients, and poor VFMD outcome was seen in 16.9% of patients. Compared with eyes with moderate to severe enhancement, eyes with mild orbital optic nerve enhancement were more likely to have poor VA outcome (odds ratio [OR], 8.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-51.14; P = 0.009), incomplete VA recovery (OR, 7.31, 95% CI, 2.42-25.47; P = 0.001), and poor VFMD outcome (adjusting for time to treatment: OR, 6.81; 95% CI, 1.85-28.98; P = 0.005; adjusting for nadir VFMD: OR, 11.65; 95% CI, 1.60-240.09; P = 0.04). Lack of optic nerve sheath enhancement additionally was associated with incomplete VA recovery (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.19-12.85; P = 0.02) compared with the presence of enhancement. These associations remained consistent in subgroup logistic regression analysis of MRIs performed before initiation of treatment but were not seen in pairwise analysis of MRIs performed after treatment.
Conclusions:
In eyes with first MOG-associated ON episodes, milder enhancement in the orbital optic nerve was associated with poorer VA and visual field recovery. Prospective and mechanistic studies are needed to confirm the prognostic usefulness of MRI in MOG-associated ON.
Financial Disclosure(S):
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
