Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Screening for Proximal Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published on: February 10, 2023
Appropriateness of care: Deep venous procedures
Karem C Harth1, Misaki M Kiguchi2
1Center for Comprehensive Venous Care, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
New technologies for venous disease treatment have advanced rapidly, but evidence-based guidelines lag behind. More research is needed to establish optimal patient selection, treatment, and surveillance for venous pathologies.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Technology Innovation
Background:
- Significant advancements in technologies for treating venous pathologies have emerged over the last decade.
- This progress benefits patients with venous disease, a population often underserved.
- However, the rapid introduction of devices like venous stents and thrombectomy tools has outpaced the development of evidence-based guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the disparity between technological advancement and guideline development in venous disease treatment.
- To emphasize the need for standardized approaches in patient selection, technical procedures, medical management, and surveillance.
- To underscore the necessity of robust clinical trials for advancing deep venous interventions.
Main Methods:
- Review of current technological advancements in venous disease treatment.
- Analysis of the current state of evidence-based guidelines for venous pathologies.
- Identification of key areas requiring standardization and further research.
Main Results:
- A wide array of new technologies, including venous stents and thrombectomy devices, are available.
- Evidence-based guidelines for the management of venous pathologies have not kept pace with technological innovation.
- Practices regarding patient selection, technical approaches, medical management, and surveillance are highly variable.
Conclusions:
- The field of deep venous interventions holds significant future potential.
- Multicenter, randomized controlled trials are crucial for developing optimal treatment strategies for patients with venous disease.
- Standardization of care is essential to maximize the benefits of new technologies for venous pathologies.
More Related Videos
08:05Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
00:09Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...