Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
Home-based EEG Neurofeedback for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
David A Rice1, Christine Ozolins2, Riya Biswas2
1Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Waitemata Pain Services, Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand Waitematā, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Active electroencephalography neurofeedback (EEG NFB) was not superior to a sham control for chronic pain. However, both interventions showed similar, clinically important pain reduction, suggesting a partially active sham may have influenced results.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Pain Management
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Chronic pain affects millions globally, necessitating effective treatment options.
- Electroencephalography neurofeedback (EEG NFB) is a potential non-pharmacological intervention.
- Previous research on EEG NFB for chronic pain lacks robust, sham-controlled trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if active-EEG NFB, added to usual care, is superior to sham-EEG NFB for chronic pain.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of active-EEG NFB compared to a sham control.
- To investigate the impact of alpha EEG NFB on pain intensity and quality of life.
Main Methods:
- A parallel, 2-arm, blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial.
- 116 participants with chronic pain were randomized to active-EEG NFB or sham-EEG NFB plus usual care.
- Interventions involved ≥32 sessions targeting relative alpha power over C4, with per-protocol analyses.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found between active-EEG NFB and sham-EEG NFB for the primary outcome (pain intensity).
- Approximately 44% of participants in both groups reported clinically important pain reduction.
- Adverse events were similar and not serious between groups; post hoc analysis suggested a partially active sham.
Conclusions:
- Active-EEG NFB was not superior to the sham control intervention for chronic pain in this trial.
- A substantial proportion of participants experienced pain relief in both groups, possibly due to the partially active sham.
- The EEG NFB intervention was safe, with no significant adverse events, and may inform future trial designs.
More Related Videos
06:13Author Spotlight: Insights into Remotely Supervised Neuromodulation Procedure for Phantom Limb Pain
Published on: March 1, 2024
11:26Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Device Development: An Updated Protocol Used at Home in Healthy Subjects and Fibromyalgia Patients
Published on: July 14, 2018