Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.2K
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

23.2K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
23.2K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.7K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.7K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

164
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
164
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

171
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
171
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.1K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Don't Tell Us How Strong It Feels! Converging and Discriminant Validity of an Indirect Measure of Emotional Evidence Accumulation Efficiency.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same author

Attention control in the peripartum period: a longitudinal study.

Archives of women's mental health·2024
Same author

Bumpy ride ahead: Anticipated effort as emotional evidence?

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024
Same author

Both pleasant and unpleasant emotional feelings follow Weber's law but it depends how you ask.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same author

Pleasant emotional feelings follow one of the most basic psychophysical laws (weber's law) as most sensations do.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2022
Same author

Cognitive appraisal contributes to feeling generation through emotional evidence accumulation rate: Evidence from instructed fictional reappraisal.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

One Standard for All: Uniform Scale for Comparing Individuals and Groups in Hierarchical Bayesian Evidence

Rotem Berkovich1, Nachshon Meiran1

  • 1Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Journal of Cognition
|August 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new Bayesian method for Evidence Accumulation Models (EAMs) to accurately analyze individual and group differences. The novel approach overcomes limitations of traditional EAMs, enabling more reliable research findings.

Keywords:
Bayesian hierarchical modelsEvidence Accumulation ModelsLinear Ballistic Accumulation model

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Psychometric Methods

Background:

  • Evidence Accumulation Models (EAMs) are widely used to investigate cognitive processes.
  • Traditional EAM fitting requires a restrictive assumption of equal parameters across participants.
  • Violating this assumption can lead to erroneous conclusions about individual and group differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel Bayesian hierarchical estimation method for EAMs.
  • To overcome the limitations of traditional EAM parameter constraints.
  • To enable accurate detection of individual and group differences in cognitive modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Employed Bayesian hierarchical estimation, setting the scale at the population level.
  • Utilized priors to fix a population-level hyper-parameter, allowing for individual and group variability.
  • Validated the method through two parameter recovery studies using the Linear Ballistic Accumulation model.

Main Results:

  • The new Bayesian method demonstrated reliable parameter recovery.
  • The method successfully identified true group differences in a case study.
  • The classic EAM approach erroneously detected non-existent group differences in the same case study.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian hierarchical method offers a robust approach for studying individual and group differences with EAMs.
  • This method overcomes critical limitations of traditional EAM fitting procedures.
  • It provides a more accurate and reliable tool for cognitive and neuroscience research.