Hemodynamic influence of mild stenosis morphology in different coronary arteries: a computational fluid dynamic

Xi Chen1, Haoyao Cao1,2, Yiming Li3

  • 1Department of Mechanics and Engineering, College Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Insights

Mild coronary stenosis (20-50%) poses risks, with specific locations and degrees influencing progression to acute coronary syndromes. Hemodynamic analysis reveals distinct patterns for different stenosis severities, guiding clinical assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging and Diagnostics

Background:

  • Mild coronary stenosis (degree of stenosis < 50%) is often considered nonobstructive.
  • The progression of mild stenosis to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unpredictable.
  • Understanding hemodynamic factors is crucial for assessing the risk of mild lesions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hemodynamic influence of various mild stenosis morphologies in coronary arteries.
  • To correlate hemodynamic characteristics with the risk of plaque progression and rupture.
  • To provide a basis for improved clinical assessment and management of mild coronary stenosis.

Main Methods:

  • Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was employed to model coronary stenoses.
  • Hemodynamic parameters including fractional flow reserve (FFR), wall shear stress (WSS), and oscillatory shear index (OSI) were calculated.
  • Simulations were based on healthy individual data with varying degrees of stenosis (DS) and morphologies.

Main Results:

  • Significant hemodynamic variations were observed across different DS (20-50%) and locations.
  • Mild stenosis (20-30% DS) generated low time-average wall shear stress (TAWSS) (<4 dyne/cm²), indicating potential for vortex formation.
  • Moderate stenosis (30-50% DS) in the left main artery and LAD resulted in high TAWSS (>40 dyne/cm²) and extensive high OSI (>0.19 cm²) areas, suggesting plaque injury risk.

Conclusions:

  • While mild stenosis (FFR > 0.95) may not cause immediate ischemia, its hemodynamic profile warrants attention.
  • Stenosis location and DS are critical; proximal LAD lesions (20-30% DS) show rapid progression potential.
  • Lesions with 30-50% DS are associated with plaque injury and rupture risk, necessitating closer monitoring and preventive strategies.