Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025
Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Evaluating the gap in rapid diagnostic testing: insights from subnational Kenyan routine health data
Bibian N Robert1, Angela K Moturi2, Felix Bahati3
1Population & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya brobert@kemri-wellcome.org.
Background:
Understanding diagnostic capacities is essential to addressing healthcare provision and inequity, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. This study used routine data to assess trends in rapid diagnostic test (RDT) reporting, supplies and unmet needs across national and 47 subnational (county) levels in Kenya.
Methods:
We extracted facility-level RDT data for 19 tests (2018-2020) from the Kenya District Health Information System, linked to 13 373 geocoded facilities. Data quality was assessed for reporting completeness (ratio of reports received against those expected), reporting patterns and outliers. Supply assessment covered 12 RDTs reported by at least 50% of the reporting facilities (n=5251), with missing values imputed considering reporting trends. Supply was computed by aggregating the number of tests reported per facility. Due to data limitations, demand was indirectly estimated using healthcare-seeking rates (HIV, malaria) and using population data for venereal disease research laboratory test (VDRL), with unmet need computed as the difference between supply and demand.
Results:
Reporting completeness was under 40% across all counties, with RDT-specific reporting ranging from 9.6% to 89.6%. Malaria RDTs showed the highest annual test volumes (6.3-8.0 million) while rheumatoid factor was the lowest (0.5-0.7 million). Demand for RDTs varied from 2.5 to 11.5 million tests, with unmet needs between 1.2 and 3.5 million. Notably, malaria testing and unmet needs were highest in Turkana County, as well as the western and coastal regions. HIV testing was concentrated in the western and central regions, with decreasing unmet needs from 2018 to 2020. VDRL testing showed high volumes and unmet needs in Nairobi and select counties, with minimal yearly variation.
Conclusion:
RDTs are crucial in enhancing diagnostic accessibility, yet their utilisation varies significantly by region. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to close testing gaps and improve data reporting completeness. Addressing these disparities is vital for equitably enhancing diagnostic services nationwide.
