Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Bridging Parallel Disciplines: An Integrated Workshop for Clinical and Imaging Informatics Training.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

Same author

Synthetic MRI and Delta Histogram Analysis: A Step Forward in Noninvasive Meningioma Grading.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026

Same author

Personalized machine learning-guided radiation dose escalation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prospective pilot study.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Brain tumor segmentation in Sub-Saharan Africa patient population: The BraTS-Africa challenge.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026

Same author

A phase 2 study of niraparib concomitant with tumor treating fields in patients with recurrent grade 4 glioma.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026

Same author

Transformer-based Fusion of Longitudinal Multimodal Radiomic Features from Chest Radiography and CT in COVID-19.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026

Same journal

Kolmogorov-Arnold Guided Local-Global Attention for Medical Image Classification.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Inner Ear Computed Tomography Analysis: Radiomics-Based Comparison of Affected and Unaffected Ears in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

Same journal

High Adoption, Higher Expectations: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Radiologist Engagement with Artificial Intelligence in the United Arab Emirates.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Complex-valued Multi-scale Hybrid Attention Network for Fast MRI via Sparsified Data Learning.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Automatic Phase and Sequence Identification in Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced Liver MRI Using Deep Convolutional and Sequential Learning.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Ultrasound-Based AI in Predicting Hormone Receptor Status in Breast Cancer: Is "Digital Biopsy" Possible.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

From Revisions to Insights: Converting Radiology Report Revisions into Actionable Educational Feedback Using

Shawn Lyo¹, Suyash Mohan², Alvand Hassankhani²

¹Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. shawn.kt.lyo@gmail.com.

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine

|August 19, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Generative AI can effectively identify discrepancies in radiology trainee reports, providing structured feedback. This technology shows promise for enhancing radiologic training by offering actionable insights from report revisions.

Keywords:

Education Generative artificial intelligence Large language models Precision radiology education Radiology training Report revisions

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules

Author Spotlight: A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules

Published on: May 19, 2023

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

Author Spotlight: A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules

Author Spotlight: A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules

Published on: May 19, 2023

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
Natural Language Processing

Background:

Expert feedback is vital for radiology training but challenging due to workload and remote reading.
Trainee report revisions offer educational insights, yet synthesizing this data is difficult.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the efficacy of generative AI in analyzing radiology trainee report revisions.
To identify discrepancies, categorize their severity and type, and generate educational feedback topics.

Main Methods:

Utilized OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo API to analyze preliminary and finalized radiology reports.
Compared AI-identified discrepancies with expert radiologist assessments.
Assessed discrepancy detection, severity, type categorization, and relevance of generated teaching points.

Main Results:

The AI model detected significantly more discrepancies than radiologists.
High correlation found between AI and radiologist discrepancy detection (r=0.778).
Generated teaching points were relevant in ~85% of cases, correlating with discrepancy severity.

Conclusions:

Generative AI models demonstrate significant potential for identifying report discrepancies in radiology.
AI can provide structured, actionable feedback to enhance radiologic training.
This approach offers a promising solution to overcome challenges in providing timely, effective feedback.