Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025
Mouse Model of Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: March 9, 2019
Heterogeneous Outcome Selection and Incomplete Prespecification of Outcomes in Systematic Reviews: A Case Study on
Jun Zhang1, Mingyue Zhang, Caihua Xu
1At the Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, Jun Zhang, MD, is Lecturer; Mingyue Zhang, BS, and Caihua Xu, BS, are Master's Students; Jinhui Tian, PhD, is Professor; and Donghua Yang, MD, is Lecturer. Bo Wang, MD, is Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Gausu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou.
Objective:
To understand how reviewers select and prespecify outcomes for systematic reviews (SRs), the authors report on the outcomes used in SRs of pressure injury (PI) intervention and treatment and evaluate their completeness of prespecification.
Data Sources:
The authors searched four electronic databases for SRs involving PI prevention and/or treatments.
Study Selection:
Inclusion criteria were SRs and meta-analyses evaluating interventions for preventing or treating PI. Studies without systematic search or risk-of-bias assessment, conference proceedings, and articles not in Chinese or English were excluded.
Data Extraction:
Two reviewers extracted and categorized the outcomes in domains, assessing outcome prespecification using a five-element framework. Data items included study characteristics, target population, type of interventions, and outcome variables.
Data Synthesis:
This review included 95 SRs that reported a total of 432 instances of 24 different outcome domains. An average of four outcome domains were reported per SR. The most frequently reported domains were PI healing, PI occurrence, and PI status. Of the 62 SRs that prespecified primary outcomes, 40 (64.52%) reported more than one primary outcome. Only 24 of the 432 instances (5.56%) were completely specified. Among the 24 outcome domains, 12 (50.00%) were listed as primary outcomes at least once. Primary outcomes were more completely specified than nonprimary outcomes.
Conclusions:
Systematic reviews of PI prevention and/or treatment report diverse, incompletely prespecified outcomes, highlighting the need for a core outcome set to standardize key clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:37Application of Lucilia sericata Larvae in Debridement of Pressure Wounds in Outpatient Settings
Published on: December 4, 2021
06:45Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
Published on: May 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
02:07Blind Procedures