Plasma exchange-sensitive syncytial glomerulopathy in a kidney transplant patient

Marco Delsante1, Elena Martinelli2, Chiara Foroni3

  • 1Unità Operativa di Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Parma and Dipartimento Di Medicina E Chirurgia, Università Di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy. delsantem@gmail.com.

Insights

Microvascular inflammation in kidney transplants can stem from various causes, not just anti-HLA antibodies. Identifying specific patterns, like those linked to anti-AT1R antibodies, is crucial for targeted treatment and improved outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Transplant Immunology
  • Histopathology

Background:

  • Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is a key feature of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplants, often linked to anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA).
  • Histological features of MVI can be similar regardless of its origin, making differentiation challenging.
  • Emerging evidence suggests non-HLA antibody mechanisms contribute to MVI, necessitating refined diagnostic approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a case of kidney transplant recipient with microvascular inflammation.
  • To investigate the potential role of non-HLA antibodies, specifically anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT1R) antibodies, in driving MVI.
  • To highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of identifying specific MVI etiologies.

Main Methods:

  • Case report of a kidney transplant recipient with worsening renal function and new-onset hypertension.
  • Analysis of kidney biopsy findings, including glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, and immunostaining for ERG.
  • Detection of anti-HLA-DSA and anti-AT1R antibodies (Ab).
  • Monitoring of therapeutic response to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and plasma exchange (PEX).

Main Results:

  • Histology revealed severe MVI with glomerulitis, intracapillary multinucleated cells (ERG-positive), and peritubular capillaritis, C4d negative.
  • Anti-HLA-DSA were absent, but high levels of anti-AT1R antibodies were detected.
  • Treatment with ARBs and PEX led to blood pressure normalization, reduced AT1R Ab, and proteinuria.
  • Rituximab therapy after a subsequent liver transplant failed to maintain remission, with the patient remaining PEX-dependent.

Conclusions:

  • This case suggests that anti-AT1R antibodies can cause significant microvascular inflammation in kidney allografts, mimicking features of antibody-mediated rejection.
  • Accurate histological pattern description and etiological differentiation are vital for guiding therapeutic strategies in MVI.
  • Non-HLA antibodies represent an important target for understanding and managing kidney transplant dysfunction.