Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Clinical value of guideline recommended molecular targets and genome targeted cancer therapies: cross sectional study
Ariadna Tibau1,2, Thomas J Hwang3,4,5, Jerry Avorn3
1Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA atibaumartorell@bwh.harvard.edu.
Objective:
To assess the clinical benefit and actionability of molecular targets for genome targeted cancer drugs recommended for clinical practice by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).
Design:
Cross sectional study.
Participants/Setting:
Genome targeted cancer drugs recommended by NCCN guidelines in the advanced setting.
Main Outcome Measures:
Molecular target actionability was assessed using the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT). Clinical benefit of genome targeted oncology therapies was evaluated using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). Molecular targets at ESCAT category level I associated with studies showing substantial clinical benefit by ESMO-MCBS (grades 4-5) were designated as high benefit, and those linked to studies achieving an ESMO-MCBS grade of 3 were categorized as being of promising but unproven benefit.
Results:
411 recommendations related to 74 genome targeted drugs targeting 50 driver alterations were examined. Most recommendations (346/411; 84%) were associated with clinical trials of various phases, but 16% (65/411) relied on only case reports or pre-clinical studies. However, clinical trials mostly comprised phase I or phase II (271/346; 78%), single arm (262/346; 76%) studies. The primary endpoint assessed in most trials was overall response rate (271/346; 78%) rather than survival. ESCAT tier I targetability encompassed 60% (246/411) of target recommendations, 35% (142/411) were classified as tier II or III, and 6% (23/411) had their relevance yet to be determined (tiers IV to X). When ESMO-MCBS was applied to 267 scorable trials, only 12% (32/267) showed substantial clinical benefit (grades 4-5) and 45% (121/267) were grade 3. When both frameworks were combined, 12% (32/267) of trials supported a determination of high benefit and 33% (88/267) indicated promising but unproven benefit. Of the 118 interventions endorsed by NCCN authors as preferred, 62 (53%) applied to treatments with high or promising but unproven benefit.
Conclusion:
According to the ESCAT and ESMO-MCBS frameworks, about one eighth of genome based treatments for solid cancer were rated as likely to offer a high benefit to patients, whereas around a third were identified as offering a promising but unproven substantial benefit. Ensuring that NCCN recommendations are aligned with expected clinical benefits is crucial for promoting informed, evidence based, genomic guided treatment decisions.
Insights
Most genome-targeted cancer drugs recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) lack high clinical benefit. Further evaluation is needed to align NCCN recommendations with evidence-based genomic cancer treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) provides guidelines for cancer treatments.
- Genome-targeted cancer drugs represent a growing area of precision oncology.
- Assessing the clinical utility of these targeted therapies is crucial for evidence-based practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical benefit and actionability of molecular targets for NCCN-recommended genome-targeted cancer drugs.
- To determine the alignment of NCCN recommendations with established frameworks for clinical benefit and target actionability.
- To inform clinical decision-making in genomic-guided cancer therapy.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed NCCN-recommended genome-targeted drugs for advanced cancers.
- Molecular target actionability was assessed using the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT).
- Clinical benefit was evaluated using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS), categorizing benefits as 'high' or 'promising but unproven'.
Main Results:
- Of 411 recommendations for 74 genome-targeted drugs, 84% were linked to clinical trials, but many were early-phase or single-arm studies.
- Only 12% of scorable trials demonstrated substantial clinical benefit (ESMO-MCBS grades 4-5), while 45% showed a grade of 3 (promising but unproven benefit).
- Combining ESCAT and ESMO-MCBS, 12% of interventions had high benefit, and 33% had promising but unproven benefit; 53% of NCCN-preferred interventions fell into these categories.
Conclusions:
- A significant proportion of genome-targeted cancer treatments recommended by NCCN show limited or unproven clinical benefit according to ESCAT and ESMO-MCBS.
- Only about one-eighth of these treatments offer high clinical benefit, with roughly one-third offering promising but unproven benefit.
- Aligning NCCN recommendations with robust clinical benefit data is essential for informed, evidence-based genomic-guided cancer treatment decisions.
More Related Videos
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Treatment Resistant Cancers