Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Dissection of Larval Zebrafish Gonadal Tissue
Published on: April 26, 2017
Transitions in sex determination mechanisms through parental and sexual antagonism
1Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. maschenkel@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Sex chromosomes carry the sex-determining locus, causing them to be differently transmitted to and from females and males. These differences lead them to be selected upon in different ways, and hence they are predicted to become enriched for sexually- and parentally-antagonistic genes. Sexually-antagonistic genes have opposing fitness effects in females versus in males; parentally-antagonistic genes have opposing fitness effects when inherited maternally versus paternally. Sexually-antagonistic selection can drive sex determination transitions, whereby an autosome pair becomes a sex chromosome pair in lieu of the ancestral sex chromosomes. Whether parentally-antagonistic selection can similarly drive sex determination transitions remains unknown. I present a model to investigate the potential for transitions in sex determination through parentally-antagonistic selection as compared to sexually-antagonistic selection. This model assumes an ancestral sex-chromosomal sex-determining locus linked to a parentally- or sexually-antagonistic gene, and an autosomal parentally- or sexually-antagonistic gene in whose vicinity a novel sex-determining gene arises. I find that parentally-antagonistic selection can promote the spread of novel sex-determining genes as well as maintain ancestral sex-determining genes when the invasion of the novel sex-determining gene would involve transitions from male to female heterogamety (or vice versa), similar to sexually-antagonistic selection. Transitions between male and female heterogamety are, however, more likely when the ancestral sex-determining locus is linked to a parentally-antagonistic locus. Consequently, parentally-antagonistic selection can enable some highly unusual evolutionary patterns not encountered in other evolutionary models of sex determination. These results provide novel insights into why some sex-determining mechanisms may be so evolutionary labile.
Related Concept Videos
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
Development of the Sexual Organs in the Embryo and Fetus
Near the gonadal ridges, two duct systems are present: the mesonephric ducts (Wolffian ducts) and paramesonephric ducts (Müllerian ducts). These ducts form the basis for the...
The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness
Evolution
Around 300 million years ago, the two sex chromosomes diverged from two identical autosomal chromosomes. Over time, the Y chromosome has lost most of its genes, shrinking in size....
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Dosage Compensation
In addition to sexual development, the X chromosome has genes involved in autosomal functions such as brain development and the immune system. Therefore, males and females with distinct numbers of X chromosomes will...
What is a Species?

