Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay to Identify Novel NFAT2 Target Genes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published on: December 4, 2018
Prognostic significance of CRLF2 in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Zilu Meng1, Hanxue Zheng1, Yang Liu1
1Department of Hematology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, No.82, Cuiyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu Province, China.
Abstract:
The association between cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2) and clinical outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been a topic of ongoing debate, with divergent findings. This article intended to investigate the influence of CRLF2 alterations on ALL prognosis. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this meta-analysis was conducted. Hazard ratio (HR) values and confidence intervals (CIs) were the primary statistical measures used. Data heterogeneity was judged using the chi-square test and I2 statistic. Publication bias was appraised with funnel plots, Begg's test, and Egger's test. 16 studies with 6771 patients were finally screened out. CRLF2 over-expression (CRLF2 OE) was associated with poorer event-free survival (EFS) (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.18-2.44, P = 0.004) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.28-2.24, P = 0.000) in pediatric ALL. Patients with CRLF2-deregulation (CRLF2-d), also known as CRLF2 rearrangement, exhibited shorter overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.49-3.32, P = 0.000), EFS (HR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.43-2.60, P = 0.000), and RFS (HR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.53-3.18, P = 0.000) compared to those without CRLF2-d. Subgroup analysis of multivariate HRs and corresponding CIs indicated that childhood with CRLF2 OE had a shorter RFS (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.28-2.24, P = 0.006), and CRLF2-d was identified as an independent prognostic biomarker for OS (HR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.49-3.32, P = 0.000), EFS (HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.44-2.64, P = 0.000), and RFS (HR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.53-3.18, P = 0.000) in pediatric ALL patients. Both CRLF2 OE and CRLF2-d are associated with poor prognosis in ALL patients.

