Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

37.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.6K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

38.9K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impacts of physical and testimonial evidence on South Korean Police interrogator's selection of tactics.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2026
Same author

Assessing lying about opinions through extending the devil's advocate interview protocol with a same example statement.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset).

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

Who Said What? The Effects of Cognitive Load on Source Monitoring and Memory for Multiple witnesses' Accounts.

Applied cognitive psychology·2024
Same author

All mouth and trousers? Use of the Devil's Advocate questioning protocol to determine authenticity of opinions about protester actions.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K

Introducing the high-context communication style interview protocol to detect deception in pairs.

Sharon Leal1, Aldert Vrij1, Tzachi Ashkenazi2

  • 1School of Psychology, Sport, & Health Sciences, University of Portsmouth, PO1 2DY Hants, UK.

Acta Psychologica
|August 21, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pairs of truth tellers can be distinguished from liars using high-context communication cues, especially when asked unexpected questions during individual interviews. Observers accurately detected deception based on these verbal cues.

Keywords:
DeceptionHigh-context communicationLie detectionUnexpected questions approach

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

849

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.4K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

849

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Communication Studies
  • Forensic Science

Background:

  • Distinguishing truth-tellers from liars is crucial in various settings.
  • High-context communication, relying on shared understanding, may differ between truthful and deceptive pairs.
  • Previous research has explored verbal cues in deception detection, but less is known about high-context communication in pairs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if high-context communication cues can differentiate pairs of truth-tellers from pairs of lie-tellers.
  • To determine the effectiveness of verbal cues in detecting deception in dyadic interactions.
  • To assess the impact of question type (expected vs. unexpected) and interview format (individual vs. collective) on deception detection accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted involving pairs of individuals (friends or strangers posing as friends).
  • Participants answered expected and unexpected questions, with interviews conducted individually or collectively.
  • Transcripts were analyzed for specific verbal cues (details, complications, plausibility, predictability, overlap, repetitions), and observers attempted to detect deception.

Main Results:

  • Verbal cues were more diagnostic of veracity when participants were asked unexpected questions.
  • Observers demonstrated better accuracy in distinguishing truths from lies when pairs were interviewed individually, particularly with unexpected questions.
  • The high-context communication style, as indicated by verbal cues, proved more revealing in individual interviews.

Conclusions:

  • Individual interviews focusing on unexpected questions are more effective for detecting deception in pairs using high-context communication analysis.
  • Verbal cues related to high-context communication provide valuable insights into the veracity of dyadic interactions.
  • This research offers a novel approach to deception detection by leveraging communication style differences in pairs.