Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025
Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Childhood cancer in Bangladesh: a qualitative evaluation
Taufique Joarder1, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal Tune2, Shahaduz Zaman3
1SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Insights
This project improved childhood cancer care in Bangladesh by providing subsidies and raising awareness, though challenges in management and long-term patient education remain. Addressing these will ensure project sustainability and better outcomes for children with cancer.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Pediatric Oncology
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Childhood cancer survival rates are low (20%) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
- High out-of-pocket healthcare expenses (67%) burden families in Bangladesh.
- World Child Cancer-UK (WCC-UK) partnered with Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) since 2012 to improve childhood cancer care.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate the purpose and impact of the WCC-UK project in Bangladesh.
- Provide insights to donors on project contributions, best practices, and lessons learned.
- Identify challenges and offer recommendations for future project development.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative evaluation conducted from May to June 2017.
- Utilized document reviews (n=7) and key informant interviews (KIIs) with project stakeholders.
- Included in-depth interviews (IDIs) with parents of children with cancer (n=2).
Main Results:
- Project faced challenges: unclear management, ambiguous eligibility criteria, staffing issues, and communication gaps.
- BSMMU provided space and leadership; Satellite Centers supported CME and data entry.
- Subsidies were provided to poor patients; cancer awareness increased among providers and public.
- Long-term patient education system development proved challenging; staffing shortages and leadership hierarchy noted.
Conclusions:
- The project has shown progress but requires critical improvements for full objective realization.
- Recommendations include clarifying management structure and patient eligibility criteria.
- Addressing staffing, communication, and leadership inclusivity is crucial for long-term success and sustainability.
Background:
Childhood cancer persists as a prominent public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with only a 20% survival rate. In Bangladesh, 67% of healthcare expenses are out of pocket. Since 2012, World Child Cancer-UK (WCC-UK) has collaborated with Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) to address this issue. This evaluation aimed to assess the project's purpose and impact, delivering insights to donors regarding their contributions, best practices, lessons learned, potential challenges encountered, and recommendations for future project development or refinement.
Methods:
This study employed a qualitative method to evaluate the WCC-UK project objectives from May to June 2017. It involved seven document reviews and nine key informant interviews (KIIs) with project leadership, collaborating partners at the Hub and Satellites, management staff, and Twinning Partners. Besides, two in-depth interviews (IDIs) were carried out with certain beneficiaries, particularly parents of children with cancer. Thematic data analysis was performed to emanate the findings.
Results:
Despite facing challenges such as an unclear management structure, ambiguous patient eligibility criteria, personnel issues, and communication gaps, the project made strides in several areas. BSMMU provided essential space and leadership, while Satellite Centers supported the project with continuing medical education (CME) and data entry. The project offered subsidies to poor patients and improved cancer awareness among healthcare providers and service seekers. Despite some parents receiving health and nutrition education during their hospital stays, developing a long-lasting system to educate them about long-term cancer care for their children was found to be formidable. The analysis also highlighted staffing shortages, a hierarchical gap between physicians and nurses, and a predominantly male leadership structure.
Conclusions:
While the project has made progress toward its goals, there are critical areas that require attention to fully realize its objectives. Specifically, it is recommended that the project clarify its management structure, establish clear patient eligibility criteria, address staffing and communication issues, and work towards a more inclusive leadership. These improvements are essential for the project's long-term success and sustainability.
