Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling
Published on: August 5, 2016
Highly variable magmatic accretion at the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge.
Tao Zhang1, Jiabiao Li2, Xiongwei Niu1
1Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, China.
Crustal thickness at ultraslow-spreading ridges is surprisingly variable and thicker than predicted. Active mantle upwelling, not passive, likely explains this oceanic crustal accretion.
Area of Science:
- Geophysics
- Oceanography
- Tectonics
Background:
- Crustal accretion at mid-ocean ridges shapes oceanic lithosphere.
- Passive mantle upwelling models predict thin crust at spreading rates < 20 mm/year.
Purpose of the Study:
- To image the crustal structure of the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge.
- To test existing models of crustal accretion at slow-spreading rates.
Main Methods:
- High-resolution ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) experiment.
- Seismic imaging of crustal structure.
Main Results:
- Observed crustal thickness ranges from 3.3 to 8.9 km along the Gakkel Ridge axis.
- Crustal thickness increased over the past 5 Myr in an across-axis profile.
- Results contradict predictions of passive mantle upwelling models.
Conclusions:
- Buoyant active mantle flow, driven by melt extraction, explains the observed crustal thickness.
- Active mantle upwelling is more influential at slower spreading rates.
- Variability in crustal thickness is likely inherent to ultraslow-spreading ridges.
Related Concept Videos
Isothermal Processes
An ideal gas can also undergo isothermal expansion or compression.
For example, consider 1 mole of an ideal gas inside an isolated cylinder at initial volume V...
Magnetostatic Boundary Conditions
Rapidly Varying Flow
Gradually Varying Flow
General External Flow Characteristics
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...

