Proximal row carpectomy or scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis for treatment of scapholunate advanced...

Degenerative wrist conditions, such as scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, often require salvage procedures to reduce pain and improve function. For early stages of disease, both proximal row carpectomy and scaphoid excision four-corner arthrodesis are viable motion-preserving options. There remains controversy on which technique is superior. Selection is a nuanced decision that requires consideration of patient characteristics and stage of disease. The traditional notion that proximal row carpectomy should be reserved for older individuals with low demands has been challenged; long-term studies in younger populations demonstrate similar patient-reported outcomes, pain relief and survivorship without conversion to total wrist arthrodesis between proximal row carpectomy and four-corner arthrodesis. The existing evidence suggests proximal row carpectomy has advantages of greater range of motion, fewer complications and lower costs. Advancements such as arthroscopic techniques for both procedures show potential, although mastery involves a steep learning curve.