A comparison study on membrane fouling in A/O-MBR and A/A-MBR at different mixed liquor-suspended solids...

Membrane fouling leads to decreased membrane flux, increases the frequency of membrane tissue replacement and membrane cleaning, and increases the operating cost of membrane bioreactor. In this study, the pollutant removal effects, membrane fouling differences and microbial characteristics of anaerobic/aerobic MBR (A/O-MBR) and anaerobic/anoxic MBR (A/A-MBR) were investigated at different mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations. The results showed that the chemical cleaning cycle of membrane contamination was 12, 28, 44 h and 24, 40, 104 h, respectively, and the cycle was prolonged with the increase of MLSS concentration (from 6000 to 9000 mg L^-1). A/O-MBR was 1.4-2.4 times the rate of membrane fouling of A/A-MBR. In irreversible resistance, extracellular polymer substances (EPS) were the most significant contributors to membrane fouling. EPS concentration in A/A-MBR (118.33, 73.75, 54.26 mg/gMLSS) was lower than that in A/O-MBR (171.68, 91.92, 62.33 mg/gMLSS). Therefore, increasing MLSS concentration could mitigate membrane fouling. 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing demonstrated that filamentous bacteria was the primary reason for the membrane fouling difference. Filamentous bacteria were more likely to be attached to the surface of the membrane, causing membrane fouling. The abundance percentage of filamentous bacteria in A/A-MBR was smaller than that in A/O-MBR. In summary, The excellent performance of A/A-MBR in membrane fouling behaviour, resistance analysis, EPS and microorganisms proved that A/A-MBR is more promising than A/O-MBR in wastewater nitrogen and phosphorus removal. This study can provide a theoretical basis for the application of MBR in the field of sewage treatment.