Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

12:00
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
Published on: February 5, 2014
35.3K
Bounding the Softwired Parsimony Score of a Phylogenetic Network
Janosch Döcker1, Simone Linz2, Kristina Wicke3
1School of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
|August 22, 2024
Summary
Phylogenetic networks model complex evolutionary histories, but their parsimony scoring is difficult. This study bounds the score difference for phylogenetic networks, offering computational insights.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Computational Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Phylogenetic trees struggle to represent complex evolutionary histories involving reticulation events like hybridization.
- Phylogenetic networks offer a more suitable framework for depicting such intricate evolutionary pasts.
- Reconstructing phylogenetic networks is computationally challenging due to their complex structures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the maximum difference between parsimony scores of phylogenetic trees within a network and the network's own parsimony score.
- To establish bounds for this score difference in phylogenetic networks, specifically under softwired parsimony.
- To analyze the behavior of these bounds for semi-directed networks and contrast with parental parsimony.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing the concept of an 'informative blob' for analysis.
- Applying methods to rooted binary level-k phylogenetic networks with gap-free sequence alignments.
- Developing theoretical bounds for parsimony score differences.
Main Results:
- A bound is established for the difference between the parsimony score of any contained phylogenetic tree and the network's softwired parsimony score.
- This bound is shown to be independent of sequence alignment length and the number of character states.
- An analogous bound is found for semi-directed networks, but not for parental parsimony.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a theoretical bound for parsimony score differences in phylogenetic networks, aiding computational efficiency.
- The findings highlight the distinct properties of softwired versus parental parsimony in network reconstruction.
- The introduced 'informative blob' concept offers a novel tool for analyzing phylogenetic networks.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Phylogenetic Trees
45.3K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
45.3K
Phylogeny
43.7K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
43.7K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
5.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.7K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
7.1K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
7.1K
Protein Networks
2.3K
2.3K
Speciation Rates
21.1K
Overview
21.1K

