Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

07:36
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
8.5K
Conspiratorial narratives as cultural repertoires and methodological tools
1Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
The British Journal of Sociology
|August 23, 2024
Summary
Conspiratorial narratives offer sense-making tools during uncertainty, shape political subjectivities, and influence state-public dynamics. Researchers should analyze these narratives for insights into agency and group dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Political Science
- Sociology
Background:
- Conspiratorial narratives are prevalent and impactful, shaping political orientations and mobilization.
- Existing research often dismisses these narratives as illogical or incoherent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the socio-political dynamics behind the prevalence and impact of conspiratorial narratives.
- To explore the emergence, circulation, and effects of these narratives.
- To raise methodological questions regarding the study of conspiratorial narratives.
Main Methods:
- Ethnographic studies in Istanbul and Trabzon, Turkey.
- Analysis of data and field work notes.
- Close scrutiny of conspiratorial narratives rather than dismissal.
Main Results:
- Conspiratorial narratives function as sense-making tools during uncertainty, drawing on cultural repertoires.
- These narratives challenge mainstream discourse, shape subjectivities, and empower individuals as agents.
- The circulation of conspiratorial narratives impacts state-public relationships, often portraying leaders centrally within neoliberal frameworks.
Conclusions:
- Conspiratorial narratives provide valuable insights into actors' agency, group dynamics, and responses to injustice.
- Researchers should engage with these narratives methodologically to understand complex socio-political phenomena.
- Case studies show that less powerful actors may not always antagonize the state.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.6K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
49.8K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.8K
Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.1K

