Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Purpose of Health Records I

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

Data Reporting and Recording

Data Reporting and Recording

Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with preservation of the remnant bundle].

Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology·2013

Same author

[Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with tendon graft enveloped by preserved remnants].

Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology·2013

Same author

Genetic and molecular biological characterization of two homologous cheR genes from Leptospira interrogans.

Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica·2013

Same author

Upregulation of glycoprotein nonmetastatic B by colony-stimulating factor-1 and epithelial cell adhesion molecule in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Oncology research·2013

Same author

Effect of implantation of biodegradable magnesium alloy on BMP-2 expression in bone of ovariectomized osteoporosis rats.

Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications·2013

Same author

[Texture variation of CC 5052 aluminum alloy slab from surface to center layer by XRD].

Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Comparing Patient Perception and Physician's Records: Generative AI Performance Evaluation.

Nattawipa Thawinwisan¹, Chang Liu², Kazumasa Kishimoto²

¹Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

|August 23, 2024

Summary

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) effectively compares patient perceptions and physician records, improving healthcare communication. This technology enhances understanding between patients and doctors by analyzing documented symptoms and overall content.

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence Medical Records Patient Perception

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Medical Informatics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Clinical Communication

Background:

Patient perception significantly influences health outcomes and medical compliance.
Discrepancies between patient perception and physician documentation can impede doctor-patient communication.
Accurate understanding of patient experiences is crucial for effective treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the efficacy of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in comparing patient-reported perceptions with physician documentation.
To assess the AI's ability to identify and contrast information from patient questionnaires and medical records in breast surgery.
To quantify the AI's performance using precision, recall, and F1 scores against a human-created ground truth.

Main Methods:

Utilized generative AI to analyze and compare content from patient questionnaires and physician records.
Focused on data from the Department of Breast Surgery.
Evaluated AI performance by comparing its output to a human-annotated ground truth, calculating precision and recall.

Main Results:

Generative AI demonstrated high performance in comprehending and contrasting patient and physician documentation.
F1 scores for the AI's comparison ranged from 0.77 to 0.97.
The AI accurately identified differences in symptom reporting and overall content between patients and physicians.

Conclusions:

Generative AI shows significant potential in bridging the gap between patient perception and clinical documentation.
This technology can enhance mutual comprehension in healthcare settings.
AI tools can contribute to improved doctor-patient communication and potentially better patient outcomes.