The role of extensive lymph node dissection in the new grading system for lung adenocarcinoma
- Chia Liu 1, Lei-Chi Wang 2, Jui-Fen Chang 3, Ko-Han Lin 4, Yi-Chen Yeh 5, Po-Kuei Hsu 6, Chien-Sheng Huang 6, Chih-Cheng Hsieh 7, Han-Shui Hsu 6
- Chia Liu 1, Lei-Chi Wang 2, Jui-Fen Chang 3
- 1Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery Taipei, Taiwan.
- 2Department of Pathology Taipei, Taiwan.
- 3Department of Nursing Taipei, Taiwan.
- 4Department of Nuclear Medicine Taipei, Taiwan.
- 5Department of Pathology Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei, Taiwan.
- 6Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei, Taiwan.
- 7Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei, Taiwan; New Taipei City Hospital, Department of Surgery, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
- 0Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery Taipei, Taiwan.
|
August 23, 2024
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Lung adenocarcinoma survival rates decline with increasing tumor grade. Complete lymphadenectomy (IASLC-R0) improves outcomes for grade 3 tumors, while uncertain resection (R(un)) worsens survival, necessitating closer monitoring.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Thoracic Surgery
- Cancer Prognostics
Background
- Lung adenocarcinoma grading systems are crucial for predicting patient outcomes.
- The extent of lymphadenectomy (lymph node removal) is a key surgical factor influencing survival.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the prognostic significance of the new lung adenocarcinoma grading system.
- To assess the impact of lymphadenectomy extent (complete vs. uncertain resection) on survival outcomes.
Main Methods
- Analysis of 1258 lung adenocarcinoma patients undergoing curative resection (2006-2017).
- Evaluation of overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
- Stratification by tumor grade (1-3) and lymphadenectomy extent (IASLC-R0 vs. R(un)).
Main Results
- Survival rates (OS, CSS, RFS) significantly decreased from grade 1 to grade 3.
- Grade 3 tumors and uncertain lymphadenectomy (R(un)) were independent predictors of poorer survival.
- Grade 3 patients undergoing complete lymphadenectomy (IASLC-R0) showed significantly better OS and RFS than those with R(un).
Conclusions
- Lung adenocarcinoma outcomes worsen across tumor grades 1-3.
- Uncertain lymphadenectomy (R(un)) negatively impacts survival in grade 3 lung adenocarcinoma.
- Consider intensive monitoring and adjuvant therapy for grade 3 patients with R(un) lymphadenectomy.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

