Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.1K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.1K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

2.1K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.1K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

39.9K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.9K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Xiao and Imada: Prosociality across group boundaries is possible without partner choice.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Predicting COVID-19 Vaccination Decision-Making Profiles Among Dutch Adults: From Survey to National Administrative Data.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Don't rock the boat! Do men prefer women leaders who support the status quo?

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

The co-occurrence of ingroup and outgroup prosociality across 121 societies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Impact of adherence and stringency on the effectiveness of lockdown measures: A modelling study.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Social norm dynamics and cooperation in changing groups.

Kasper Otten1, Vincent Buskens2, Wojtek Przepiorka2

  • 1Utrecht University, Department of Sociology, Netherlands; Research and Data Centre (WODC), Department of Asylum and Migration, Netherlands.

Current Opinion in Psychology
|August 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Group changes impact social norms and cooperation. Newcomers initially cooperate less but adapt over time, though group identification may lag, highlighting research gaps in dynamic social structures.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Social psychology
  • Behavioral economics
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Social norms are crucial for cooperation in human groups.
  • Understanding how group dynamics, specifically member turnover, affect these norms is vital.
  • Existing literature on the impact of group changes on social norms and cooperation is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the existing literature on the effects of group member changes on social norms and cooperation.
  • To identify trends in how newcomers and incumbents interact and adapt within groups.
  • To highlight limitations in current research and suggest future directions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review synthesizing existing studies on group dynamics, social norms, and cooperation.
  • Analysis of findings regarding newcomer behavior and adaptation.
  • Identification of research gaps and methodological challenges.

Main Results:

  • Newcomers tend to exhibit lower cooperation levels compared to established group members (incumbents).
  • Cooperation levels of newcomers show a tendency to adjust towards incumbent levels over time.
  • Adaptation in cooperation does not always correlate with changes in group identification or adherence to social norms.

Conclusions:

  • Group member turnover significantly influences cooperation dynamics.
  • While behavioral adaptation occurs, deeper integration into group norms and identity may be slower for newcomers.
  • Further research is needed to address data limitations and explore the nuances of social norm evolution in fluid groups.