Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
Published on: December 15, 2023
Improving the explainability of autoencoder factors for commodities through forecast-based Shapley values
Roy Cerqueti1,2, Antonio Iovanella3, Raffaele Mattera4
1Department of Social and Economic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy. roy.cerqueti@uniroma1.it.
Abstract:
Autoencoders are dimension reduction models in the field of machine learning which can be thought of as a neural network counterpart of principal components analysis (PCA). Due to their flexibility and good performance, autoencoders have been recently used for estimating nonlinear factor models in finance. The main weakness of autoencoders is that the results are less explainable than those obtained with the PCA. In this paper, we propose the adoption of the Shapley value to improve the explainability of autoencoders in the context of nonlinear factor models. In particular, we measure the relevance of nonlinear latent factors using a forecast-based Shapley value approach that measures each latent factor's contributions in determining the out-of-sample accuracy in factor-augmented models. Considering the interesting empirical instance of the commodity market, we identify the most relevant latent factors for each commodity based on their out-of-sample forecasting ability.
Related Concept Videos
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients
For extracting a solute from an aqueous phase into an...
Residual Plots
When the residual values are plotted against the variable x, it is called a residual...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Error
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

