Cost-effectiveness of incorporating self-imaging optical coherence tomography into fundus photography-based diabetic...

Diabetic macular edema (DME) has emerged as the foremost cause of vision loss in the population with diabetes. Early detection of DME is paramount, yet the prevailing screening, relying on two-dimensional and labor-intensive fundus photography (FP), results in frequent unwarranted referrals and overlooked diagnoses. Self-imaging optical coherence tomography (SI-OCT), offering fully automated, three-dimensional macular imaging, holds the potential to enhance DR screening. We conducted an observational study within a cohort of 1822 participants with diabetes, who received comprehensive assessments, including visual acuity testing, FP, and SI-OCT examinations. We compared the performance of three screening strategies: the conventional FP-based strategy, a combination strategy of FP and SI-OCT, and a simulated combination strategy of FP and manual SD-OCT. Additionally, we undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis utilizing Markov models to evaluate the costs and benefits of the three strategies for referable DR. We found that the FP + SI-OCT strategy demonstrated superior sensitivity (87.69% vs 61.53%) and specificity (98.29% vs 92.47%) in detecting DME when compared to the FP-based strategy. Importantly, the FP + SI-OCT strategy outperformed the FP-based strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $8016 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), while the FP + SD-OCT strategy was less cost-effective, with an ICER of $45,754/QALY. Our results were robust to extensive sensitivity analyses, with the FP + SI-OCT strategy standing as the dominant choice in 69.36% of simulations conducted at the current willingness-to-pay threshold. In summary, incorporating SI-OCT into FP-based screening offers substantial enhancements in sensitivity, specificity for detecting DME, and most notably, cost-effectiveness for DR screening.