Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
Who is performing the driving tasks after interventions? Investigating drivers' understanding of mode transition
Soyeon Kim1, Fjollë Novakazi2, Elmer van Grondelle3
1Department of Transport and Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; Department of Human-Centered Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Mode awareness is important for the safe use of automated vehicles, yet drivers' understanding of mode transitions has not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, we administered an online survey to 838 respondents to examine their understanding of control responsibilities in partial and conditional driving automation with four types of interventions (brake pedal, steering wheel, gas pedal, and take-over request). Results show that most drivers understand that they are responsible for speed and distance control after brake pedal interventions and steering control after steering wheel interventions. However, drivers have mixed responses regarding the responsibility for speed and distance control after steering wheel interventions and the responsibility for steering control after gas pedal interventions. With a higher automation level (conditional driving automation), drivers expect automation to remain responsible more often compared to a lower automation level (partial driving automation). Regarding Hands-on requirements, more than 99% of respondents answered that drivers would keep their hands on the steering wheel after all intervention types in partial automation, while 60-95% would place their hands on the wheel after various intervention types in conditional automation. A misalignment between actual logic and drivers' expectations regarding control responsibilities is observed by comparing survey responses to the mode transition logic of commercial partially automated vehicles. To resolve confusion about control responsibilities and ensure consistent expectations, we propose implementing a consistent mode design and providing enhanced information to drivers.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence of...
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

