Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Effects of machine learning errors on human decision-making: manipulations of model accuracy, error types, and error
Laura E Matzen1, Zoe N Gastelum2, Breannan C Howell2
1Sandia National Laboratories, Mail Stop 1327, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM, 87185-1327, USA. lematze@sandia.gov.
Human performance in object detection tasks is impacted by machine learning (ML) model accuracy. Participants struggled to identify ML model misses more than false alarms, especially with highly accurate models.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Cognitive Psychology
- Machine Learning Evaluation
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used to support human decision-making in various tasks.
- Understanding how humans interact with and are affected by ML outputs, especially errors, is crucial for effective deployment.
- Previous research has explored human-AI collaboration, but the specific cognitive impacts of different ML error types require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cognitive effects of correct and incorrect machine learning (ML) outputs on human performance in an object detection task.
- To determine how varying ML model accuracy and error types influence human ability to identify targets and model mistakes.
- To assess the impact of task framing and error importance on human detection of ML errors.
Main Methods:
- Five experiments were conducted using a T and L object detection task (identifying T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors).
- Participants performed the task with and without ML model outputs (bounding boxes).
- Experiments manipulated ML output accuracy, error proportions (misses vs. false alarms), error importance, and task framing (human vs. model performance focus).
Main Results:
- Model misses were significantly harder for participants to detect than model false alarms.
- Human performance generally improved with higher ML model accuracy, but participants overlooked errors more frequently in highly accurate models.
- Explicit warnings about specific error types had minimal impact on participant performance.
Conclusions:
- Human cognitive processing significantly influences the interpretation and impact of machine learning (ML) model outputs.
- The type of ML error (misses vs. false alarms) has a differential impact on human detection capabilities.
- Acceptable levels of ML performance and error types must consider human cognitive limitations and task context for optimal human-AI collaboration.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Stereotype Content Model
Random and Systematic Errors
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests

