Electronic Force Density Fields: Insights into Partial Bonds, Transition States, and Chemical Structure Evolution
Sergey V Kartashov1, Anton P Fedonin1, Robert R Fayzullin1
1Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry, FRC Kazan Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 Arbuzov Street, Kazan 420088, Russian Federation.
Abstract:
This paper presents the quantum-topological binding approach, in which the electrostatic and total static force density fields, Fes(r) and , together with the electron density gradient field ∇ρ(r), are simultaneously analyzed to elucidate the chemical structure of transition states and the nature of interatomic interactions for semibroken semiformed partial chemical bonds. The approach attributes the discrepancies between the force fields and Fes(r) to the nonclassical electron-electron interaction effects. The internuclear gap between the zero-flux boundaries of Fes(r) and ∇ρ(r) indicates the interatomic charge transfer phenomenon (ICT) that occurs upon the formation of a system from free atoms. Concomitantly, the mismatch of the zero-flux surfaces defined in and ∇ρ(r) can be interpreted as a phenomenon of the electron-transfer-induced quantum chemical response (QCR), which originates from the electron exchange correlation. Our study permits the assertion of parallels between partial bonds and noncovalent interactions, as both typically exhibit incomplete QCRs, indicating the partial electron sharing of the transferred density. The changes in atomic and pseudoatomic charges are employed to describe the evolution of the chemical structure upon the substitution reaction. It is observed that the acquired difference in the actual atomic electronegativity causes polarization upon the heterolytic breaking of virtually nonpolar bonds. It is further proposed that the proximity of closely related stationary states along the reaction path on a potential energy hypersurface implies their similarity in the manifestation of the ICT and sympathetic QCR. Furthermore, the involvement of an electron pair in a partial bond facilitates its delocalization through the attraction by the static forces and Fes(r) to a neighboring nucleus and through the smearing by the Pauli kinetic force FP(r).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Intermolecular Forces
Electronic Structure of Atoms
An atom comprises protons and neutrons, which are contained inside the dense, central core called the nucleus, with electrons present around the nucleus. Taking into account the wave–particle duality of electrons and the uncertainty in position around the nucleus, quantum mechanics provides a more accurate model for the atomic structure. It describes atomic orbitals as the regions around the nucleus where electrons of discrete energy exist, characterized by four quantum...
Chemical Bonds
Atoms participate in a chemical bond formation to acquire a completed valence-shell electron configuration similar to that of the noble gas nearest to it in atomic number. Ionic, covalent, and metallic bonds are some of the important types of chemical bonds. Bond energy and bond length determine the strength of a chemical bond.
Types of Chemical Bonds
An ionic bond is formed due to electrostatic attraction between cations and anions. Often, the ions are formed by the transfer of electrons...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...


