Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025
Quantitative Atomic-Site Analysis of Functional Dopants/Point Defects in Crystalline Materials by Electron-Channeling-Enhanced Microanalysis
Published on: May 10, 2021
Sorption behavior of strontium and europium ions from aqueous solutions using fabricated inorganic sorbent based on
M R Abass1, R A Abou-Lilah2, L M S Hussein1
1Hot Laboratories, and Waste Management Centre, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, 13759, Egypt.
Abstract:
Sorption of Sr(II) and Eu(III) from aqueous solutions was studied using tin molybdate talc sorbent synthesized by the precipitation technique. The synthesized sorbent was characterized using different analytical tools, such as; FT-IR, SEM, XRD, XRF, TGA, and DTA. The sorption studies applied to Sr(II) and Eu(III) include the effects of shaking time, pH, concentrations, and saturation capacity. The sorption of Sr(II) and Eu(III) depends on pH, reaction kinetics obey the pseudo-2nd-order model, and the Langmuir model is better suited for the sorption isotherm. The thermodynamic parameters reflect an endothermic and spontaneous sorption process. Desorption studies showed that 0.1 M HCl was the best desorbing agent for the complete recovery of Sr(II) (96.8%) and Eu(III) (92.9%). Finally, the obtained data illustrates that the synthesized sorbent can be applied and used as an efficient sorbent for the sorption of Sr(II) and Eu(III) from aqueous solutions and can be used as a promising sorbent to remove Sr(II) and Eu(III).
Related Concept Videos
00:49Gravimetry: Inorganic And Organic Precipitating Agents
03:46Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
02:48Ionic Bonding and Electron Transfer
01:19Ionic Strength: Effects on Chemical Equilibria
In this solution, the primary...
03:11Precipitation of Ions
The equation that describes the equilibrium between solid calcium carbonate and its solvated ions is:
02:46Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...