Effectiveness of Three Bleaching Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Various techniques, products, and protocols are used for the bleaching of non-vital teeth. The walking bleach technique involves sealing the bleaching agent in the pulp chamber. In the inside/outside technique, a low-concentration bleaching agent is applied at home using a custom tray. In the in-office technique, a high-concentration bleaching agent is applied by a dental professional. Limited research has compared the effectiveness of these techniques.

This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the walking bleach, the inside/outside, and the in-office bleaching techniques.

Fifty-four discolored teeth were selected according to eligibility criteria, randomized, and assigned to three treatment groups (n=18): walking bleach (sodium perborate - SP), inside/outside bleaching (7.5% hydrogen peroxide -HP7.5), and in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide - HP35). A cervical seal was placed in all the teeth, and nonvital bleaching was performed according to each technique. The CIELab color coordinates were measured using a clinical spectrophotometer at baseline, weekly, and at the 1-week follow-up. ΔE00 and ΔWID were calculated between the baseline and each evaluation time point. The ANOVA, Fisher exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the quantitative variables, and the Fisher exact test, to determine the association among categorical variables. Bleaching effectiveness was interpreted by 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.

As the treatment progressed, all techniques presented a significant increase in L* and WID (p<0.001), and a significant decrease in a* and b* (p<0.001). HP7.5 and HP35 presented greater increases in WID mean values, in comparison with SP (p=0.006). No significant differences were observed among the techniques for ΔE00 after treatment completion (p=0.383). There were no statistical differences in bleaching effectiveness among the techniques after treatment completion (p=0.098).

All techniques presented excellent effectiveness after treatment completion. However, HP7.5 and HP35 techniques provided a more rapid whitening response.