Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

06:13
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
16.7K
Maxillary Antrostomy Versus Complete Sinus Surgery for Odontogenic Sinusitis With Frontal Sinus Extension
John R Craig1, Alberto M Saibene2, Nithin D Adappa3
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.
The Laryngoscope
|August 27, 2024
Summary
For odontogenic sinusitis with frontal sinus involvement, both maxillary antrostomy alone and complete endoscopic sinus surgery offer rapid symptom relief. Complete surgery may provide quicker resolution of frontoethmoidal purulence.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Surgical Innovation
- Sinus Disease Management
Background:
- Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) often requires endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).
- The optimal extent of ESS for ODS with extramaxillary sinus involvement, specifically frontal sinus disease, remains under investigation.
- This study addresses the comparative efficacy of different surgical approaches for ODS involving the frontal sinus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare surgical outcomes between wide maxillary antrostomy (MA) alone and complete ESS in patients with ODS and frontal sinus involvement.
- To evaluate the impact of surgical extent on symptom resolution and endoscopic findings.
- To determine the optimal surgical strategy for managing ODS with frontal sinus disease.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter prospective cohort study involving 70 patients with uncomplicated ODS and maxillary, anterior ethmoid, and frontal sinus opacification.
- Patients were divided into two groups: MA alone (n=35) and complete ESS (n=35).
- Outcomes measured included 22-item sinonasal outcome tests (SNOT-22) scores, endoscopic findings, and time to resolution of symptoms and endoscopic purulence.
Main Results:
- Complete ESS showed a higher initial resolution rate of anterior ethmoid (AE) purulence at the first postoperative visit (97.1% vs. 71.4%, p=0.006).
- However, the time to resolution of AE purulence was comparable between groups by 6 weeks postoperatively (p=0.158).
- No significant differences were observed in the time to resolution of foul smell or achieving a ≥9 point SNOT-22 reduction between the MA alone and complete ESS groups.
Conclusions:
- Both MA alone and complete ESS provide rapid and sustained symptomatic relief for ODS with frontal sinus involvement.
- While complete ESS may offer faster resolution of frontoethmoidal purulence in some cases, ultimate resolution of sinus purulence is equivalent between the two surgical approaches.
- The findings suggest that MA alone can be a viable option for managing ODS with frontal sinus involvement, with complete ESS providing a potential advantage in early purulence resolution.
Keywords:
apical periodontitischronic rhinosinusitisendoscopic sinus surgerymaxillary sinusitisodontogenic sinusitisoroantral fistula
