Comparison of the BIG Score and Pediatric Trauma Score for Predicting Mortality

Adem Az1, Yunus Dogan2, Ozgur Sogut1

  • 1From the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Pediatric Emergency Care
|August 27, 2024
PubMed

Insights

The BIG score and Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) effectively predict mortality in pediatric trauma patients. The BIG score offers higher specificity and positive predictive value, while PTS demonstrates superior negative predictive value.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Trauma Surgery
  • Clinical Scoring Systems

Background:

  • Predicting mortality in pediatric patients with multiple trauma is crucial for effective clinical management.
  • Existing scoring systems require evaluation for their efficacy in diverse trauma populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive accuracy of the BIG score against the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) for mortality in pediatric multiple trauma patients.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective, single-center study analyzed 318 pediatric patients (aged 1-18) with multiple trauma.
  • Demographic and clinical data, including BIG score and PTS, were compared between survivors and non-survivors.

Main Results:

  • The BIG score cutoff of 13.7 showed 92.86% sensitivity and 95.52% specificity (AUC 0.98).
  • A PTS of 7 demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 81.03% specificity (AUC 0.97).
  • The BIG score had a higher positive predictive value (66.7%) compared to PTS (33.7%).

Conclusions:

  • Both BIG score and PTS are robust predictors of mortality in pediatric multiple trauma.
  • The BIG score exhibited superior specificity and positive predictive value.
  • A PTS of 7 provided 100% sensitivity and a higher negative predictive value.
Abstract