Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Left Atrial Appendage Opacification on Cardiac Computed Tomography in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Clinical
Shan Sui Nio1, Leon A Rinkel1, Olivia N Cramer1
1Department of Neurology Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Insights
Left atrial appendage (LAA) slow-flow is linked to stroke risk. While not impacting overall outcomes, slow-flow was associated with recurrent strokes in cryptogenic stroke patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Radiology
Background:
- Left atrial appendage (LAA) slow-flow is a potential risk factor for ischemic stroke.
- Cardiac computed tomography (CT) can assess LAA blood flow and detect abnormalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between LAA slow-flow, identified by cardiac CT, and outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
- To compare clinical characteristics, functional outcomes, stroke recurrence, and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with LAA thrombus, slow-flow, or normal LAA filling.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study of 421 patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing cardiac CT.
- LAA filling defects were categorized as thrombus (<100 HU), slow-flow (≥100 HU), or normal.
- Outcomes including modified Rankin Scale, stroke recurrence, and major adverse cardiovascular events were assessed over a 2-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- 7% of patients had LAA thrombus, 16% had slow-flow, and 76% had normal filling.
- Patients with thrombus or slow-flow had higher rates of atrial fibrillation compared to those with normal filling.
- LAA thrombus was associated with worse functional outcomes, while slow-flow showed no significant difference in functional outcome or major adverse cardiovascular events compared to normal filling.
- In cryptogenic stroke patients, slow-flow was associated with an increased risk of stroke recurrence.
Conclusions:
- LAA slow-flow shares some patient characteristics with LAA thrombus but is associated with less severe strokes.
- LAA slow-flow is not significantly linked to functional outcome or major adverse cardiovascular events in the general acute ischemic stroke population.
- LAA slow-flow is an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke specifically in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Background:
Left atrial appendage (LAA) slow-flow may increase the risk of ischemic stroke. We studied LAA attenuation on cardiac computed tomography in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Methods And Results:
We used data from a prospective cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing cardiac computed tomography during the acute stroke imaging protocol. We compared characteristics, functional outcome (modified Rankin scale: higher scores indicating worse outcome), stroke recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular events after 2-year follow-up between patients with LAA thrombus (filling defect<100 Hounsfield Unit (HU)), slow-flow (filling defect ≥100 HU) and normal filling. Of 421 patients, 31 (7%) had LAA thrombus, 69 (16%) slow-flow, and 321 (76%) normal filling. Patients with thrombus or slow-flow more often had known atrial fibrillation compared with normal filling (45%, 39%, and 9%, P<0.001). Patients with thrombus had higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-scores compared with slow-flow and normal filling (18 [interquartile range, 9-22], 6 [interquartile range, 3-17], and 5 [interquartile range, 2-11], P<0.001). Compared with normal filling, there was no difference with slow-flow in functional outcome (median modified Rankin scale, 3 versus 2; acOR 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4]), stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.3-1.9]) or major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.7-2.1]), while patients with thrombus had worse functional outcome (median modified Rankin scale, 6, acOR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.5-7.4]). In cryptogenic stroke patients (n=156) slow-flow was associated with stroke recurrence (27% versus 6%, aHR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.1-15.7]).
Conclusions:
Patients with slow-flow had similar characteristics to patients with thrombus, but had less severe strokes. Slow-flow was not significantly associated with functional outcome or major adverse cardiovascular events, but was associated with recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction

