Effects of stiffness-altered sport compression garments on lower-limb biomechanics in cutting maneuvers

Athletes commonly use compression garments (CGs) for perceived effectiveness in preventing injury occurrence. However, limited evidence is available on whether lower-limb CGs reduce the risk of injury. This study aimed at (1) evaluating the effects of CGs on mitigating the risk factors of cutting-related knee injuries; (2) identifying undesirable side-effects of CGs on other joints and cutting performance; and (3) identifying possible interactions between sex and condition. 62 healthy adults performed pre-planned 90˚ cutting tasks under four conditions: control, knee sleeves, placebo leggings and stiffness-altered leggings. Joint angle at initial contact, range of motion, moments, and ground reaction force were measured. A mixed two-way (sex*condition) ANOVA was performed, followed by post-hoc comparisons and subset analyses for sexes. Results showed that the leggings restricted hip sagittal (45.4 ± 1.3 vs. control 50.0 ± 1.3˚, p = 0.001) and rotational (16.8 ± 0.8 vs. control 22.5 ± 1.1˚, p < 0.001) motion. At initial contact, the stiffness-altered leggings reduced knee valgus (0.4 ± 0.8 vs. control -2.1 ± 0.8˚, p = 0.031). However, the altered alignment of lower-limb joints did not reduce multiplanar knee joint moments (p > 0.05). CGs were not effective protective equipment yet. There was no significant difference between knee sleeves and control, nor between leggings conditions (p > 0.05). Force plate measurements, such as increased rate of force development (stiffness-altered 42.6 ± 1.1 & placebo 42.9 ± 1.1 vs. control 39.9 ± 1.0 BW/s, p < 0.028), implied the possibility of performance enhancement through CGs. While further investigations on the optimal compression and stiffness alterations are warranted, athletes are recommended to be aware of the discrepancies between the claimed and actual biomechanical effects of CGs.