Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Use of Advanced Energy Devices and Fiberoptic Retractors in Single-Incision Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast
Hye Jin Kim1, Dong-Min Shin1, Junho Cho1
1Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) using advanced energy devices resulted in smaller incisions and comparable outcomes to conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS). This approach may improve surgical results for patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Breast Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Techniques
Background:
- Advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors can enhance surgical visualization and precision.
- Conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) relies on standard electrocautery and may involve larger incisions.
- Single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) aims to minimize surgical trauma and improve cosmetic results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare postoperative outcomes between SIBCS and CBCS with axillary staging.
- To evaluate the efficacy of advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors in SIBCS.
- To assess the impact of surgical technique on incision size, operative time, blood loss, drainage, and complications.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 244 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with axillary surgery.
- Grouped patients into CBCS (n=117) using conventional electrocautery and SIBCS (n=127) using advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors.
- Compared postoperative outcomes including incision size, operative time, blood loss, drainage duration, and complication rates.
Main Results:
- SIBCS group had significantly smaller incision sizes (6.3±2.1 cm) compared to the CBCS group (7.5±2.5 cm).
- No significant differences were observed in operating time, operative blood loss, drainage duration, or complication rates between the groups.
- Mean patient age was similar between the CBCS (55.9 years) and SIBCS (53.1 years) groups.
Conclusions:
- SIBCS utilizing advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors leads to smaller incisions and potentially better cosmetic outcomes than conventional methods.
- Advanced energy devices show promise for improving surgical outcomes in BCS with axillary staging.
- The study suggests SIBCS is a viable alternative for breast cancer surgery with comparable safety and efficacy.
More Related Videos
07:28Donor Posterior Atrial Flap Rotation for Left Atrial Cuff Reconstruction in Lung Transplantation
Published on: October 11, 2024
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022