Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First finding of Rickettsia rickettsii in Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in North America.

Journal of medical entomology·2025
Same author

Temperature Dependency of Insect's Wingbeat Frequencies: An Empirical Approach to Temperature Correction.

Insects·2024
Same author

Continuous monitoring of aerial density and circadian rhythms of flying insects in a semi-urban environment.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Toys or Tools? Utilization of Unmanned Aerial Systems in Mosquito and Vector Control Programs.

Journal of economic entomology·2021
Same author

The development of autonomous unmanned aircraft systems for mosquito control.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Identification of gravid mosquitoes from changes in spectral and polarimetric backscatter cross sections.

Journal of biophotonics·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Key Elements of Photo Attraction Bioassay for Insect Studies or Monitoring Programs
05:17

Key Elements of Photo Attraction Bioassay for Insect Studies or Monitoring Programs

Published on: July 26, 2018

7.7K

Monitoring Mosquito Abundance: Comparing an Optical Sensor with a Trapping Method.

Topu Saha1, Adrien P Genoud2, Gregory M Williams3

  • 1Department of Physics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

Insects
|August 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary

A new near-infrared optical sensor, eBoss, effectively tracks flying insect populations, including mosquitoes. It provides high-resolution data complementing traditional traps for ecological monitoring.

Keywords:
culicidaeinsect abundancemosquitoesoptical sensorspopulation monitoringtrapvector control

More Related Videos

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night
06:19

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night

Published on: December 29, 2021

2.5K
A Step-by-Step Guide to Mosquito Electroantennography
06:39

A Step-by-Step Guide to Mosquito Electroantennography

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Key Elements of Photo Attraction Bioassay for Insect Studies or Monitoring Programs
05:17

Key Elements of Photo Attraction Bioassay for Insect Studies or Monitoring Programs

Published on: July 26, 2018

7.7K
Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night
06:19

Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night

Published on: December 29, 2021

2.5K
A Step-by-Step Guide to Mosquito Electroantennography
06:39

A Step-by-Step Guide to Mosquito Electroantennography

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Entomology
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Accurate monitoring of insect populations is crucial for ecological studies and pest management.
  • Traditional methods like physical traps have limitations in temporal resolution and sample size.
  • Optical sensors offer a promising non-destructive alternative for continuous insect monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare abundance measurements from a novel near-infrared optical sensor (eBoss) with physical traps.
  • To evaluate the eBoss system's capability in monitoring flying insect aerial density and population trends.
  • To assess the suitability of optical sensors as complementary tools for entomological surveys.

Main Methods:

  • A field study was conducted over eight months comparing the Entomological Bistatic Optical Sensor System (eBoss) with eight physical traps.
  • The eBoss sensor, operating in the near-infrared, recorded insect sightings and calculated aerial density (#/m³).
  • Data on all airborne insects, and specifically male and female mosquitoes, were collected with one-minute resolution.

Main Results:

  • The eBoss recorded over 302,000 insect sightings, demonstrating a strong correlation with physical trap counts.
  • The sensor provided high temporal resolution (one minute) and a significantly larger sample size compared to traps.
  • While lacking taxonomic accuracy, eBoss offered superior statistical significance and detailed population trend insights.

Conclusions:

  • Entomological optical sensors like eBoss can provide valuable, complementary data for monitoring flying insect populations.
  • The eBoss system enables continuous, high-resolution tracking of insect abundance and activity patterns.
  • Optical sensors enhance traditional entomological monitoring by offering greater temporal detail and statistical power.