Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring ROS1 Rearrangement: Real World Testing Practices, Characteristics and

Urska Janzic1,2, Natalie Maimon Rabinovich3, Walid Shalata4

  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinic Golnik, 4204 Golnik, Slovenia.

PubMed

Insights

Newer generation agents for ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed numerically longer response rates and survival compared to crizotinib in a real-world setting. Both treatment options demonstrated comparable efficacy for advanced metastatic disease.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Genetics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • ROS1 rearrangements are uncommon drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • Crizotinib is a standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for ROS1-positive NSCLC.
  • Emerging next-generation ROS1 inhibitors offer alternative treatment options.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the real-world effectiveness of first-line crizotinib versus newer generation ROS1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC.
  • To evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes in a cohort of ROS1-expressing NSCLC patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, multi-center study including 49 patients with advanced metastatic ROS1-positive NSCLC.
  • Molecular profiling performed using FISH/CISH or Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS).
  • Patients received first-line treatment with crizotinib (n=28), newer agents (entrectinib/repotrectinib, n=14), or chemotherapy (n=7).

Main Results:

  • Overall response rates were 68% for crizotinib vs. 86% for newer agents.
  • Disease control rates were 82% for crizotinib vs. 93% for newer agents.
  • Median progression-free survival was 1.6 years for crizotinib vs. 2.35 years for newer agents.

Conclusions:

  • First-line crizotinib demonstrated comparable efficacy to newer ROS1 inhibitors in real-world NSCLC treatment.
  • Newer agents numerically improved response rates and progression-free survival.
  • Both treatment strategies showed activity against advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, with considerations for central nervous system progression.